Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #89825
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Is this a good way to implement testing |
| Date | Sat, 02 May 2015 20:58:59 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 17 |
| Message-ID | <87k2wq2tx8.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> (permalink) |
| References | <878ud6mx4y.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| Injection-Info | mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="22184b02e80198190244f5a2dd813f11"; logging-data="23504"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+W5aNIVXbuEJIQAvZGUwE0" |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:hMskAqFa1EdqIbla69xUNIbEhrc= sha1:fzaxmELUTElp9k7bXuioz3e5S/8= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:89825 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> writes: > Still on my journey to learn Python. > > At the moment I define the test functionality in the following way: > action = options[0][0] > if action == '--all': ... Yecch, use an option parsing library for that, whichever one is currently fashionable. I think optparse is deprecated now but I still use it because I'm used to it. > Is this an acceptable way of working? You should also use the currently fashionable unit testing library. I use unittest because yada yada but I think it's now considered old school.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 00:29 +0200
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-03 00:17 +0100
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-05-02 20:06 -0400
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-02 20:58 -0700
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-03 14:49 +1000
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 09:36 +0200
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-03 09:38 +0100
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-03 10:45 +0200
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 11:49 +0200
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-03 11:21 +0100
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 12:50 +0200
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-03 18:52 +1000
Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-03 11:22 +0200
csiph-web