Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #89855

Re: Is this a good way to implement testing

From Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Is this a good way to implement testing
Date 2015-05-03 12:50 +0200
Organization Decebal Computing
Message-ID <87618akk8y.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink)
References <878ud6mx4y.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <87383em7sn.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.53.1430642740.12865.python-list@python.org> <87iocakn2f.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.60.1430648512.12865.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Op Sunday 3 May 2015 12:21 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence:

>> That looks very promising. But I use the test to verify the
>> correctness and show the performance. Is that also possible? Or
>> should I split those out.
>>
>
> Get it working correctly and if it's fast enough for your needs then
> job done. If and only if you actually have a performance issue
> profile your code to find the bottlenecks, as gut instinct about
> Python performance is wrong 99.99% of the time.

I'll split them out. One is to verify the correctness, the other is to
show the difference between implementations. For example: even with
memoization the recursive version of fibonacci is much slower as the
iterative version.

-- 
Cecil Westerhof
Senior Software Engineer
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 00:29 +0200
  Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-03 00:17 +0100
  Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-05-02 20:06 -0400
  Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-05-02 20:58 -0700
    Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-03 14:49 +1000
  Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 09:36 +0200
    Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-03 09:38 +0100
    Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-03 10:45 +0200
      Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 11:49 +0200
        Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-03 11:21 +0100
          Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-03 12:50 +0200
    Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-05-03 18:52 +1000
  Re: Is this a good way to implement testing Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2015-05-03 11:22 +0200

csiph-web