Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #9354

Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com>
Newsgroups gnu.emacs.help, comp.emacs, comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle
Date Wed, 13 Jul 2011 00:51:51 +0200
Organization Informatimago
Lines 10
Message-ID <87aacji03c.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (permalink)
References <19f8eb5b-cc90-472a-8399-4a5787b6fecf@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <c1749ae0-46ee-4ae6-a4e9-60eaebbc2a35@e18g2000vbx.googlegroups.com> <2c59f63a-b46f-4ea9-bc12-da4841687117@l28g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <5cb297e4-6a39-461c-98c5-639e72e166af@p10g2000prf.googlegroups.com> <87y603nwys.fsf@pangea.home.gustad.com> <983mh1Fs7cU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace individual.net 0zf/fsPfFC6LTW+q1/SCkwTHhEbeAHM3M472VOj/Jmf5EWq3/u
Cancel-Lock sha1:ZDE0MGJmM2UzMTlhNjgwMWI5ZmE4OWQ0NTI5OTBjMmE1YWZmZjdiMg== sha1:s0/j/D5myRTAG1qSCBuiwesVL3Q=
Face iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg==
X-Accept-Language fr, es, en
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.emacs:689 comp.lang.lisp:4694 comp.lang.python:9354

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw

Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> writes:

> What's the rationale for providing them? Are the definitions
> obvious for collections that a not sets?

The rational is to prove that Xah is dumb.

-- 
__Pascal Bourguignon__                     http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Xah Lee <xahlee@gmail.com> - 2011-07-11 20:37 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle jvt <vincent.toups@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 07:30 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-12 15:27 +0000
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle fortunatus <daniel.eliason@excite.com> - 2011-07-12 09:16 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle gene heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2011-07-12 14:23 -0400
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Petter Gustad <newsmailcomp6@gustad.com> - 2011-07-12 21:02 +0200
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-07-12 19:44 +0000
      Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2011-07-13 00:51 +0200
      Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle William Clifford <wobh@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-13 17:53 -0700
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle "WJ" <w_a_x_man@yahoo.com> - 2011-07-12 19:52 +0000
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-13 13:47 +1200
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-07-12 21:58 -0400
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-13 00:39 -0400
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-07-12 22:10 -0700
  Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-13 11:29 +0300
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-07-13 10:34 -0400
      Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Teemu Likonen <tlikonen@iki.fi> - 2011-07-13 18:25 +0300
    Re: Lisp refactoring puzzle Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-07-14 15:12 +1200

csiph-web