Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #8153

Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked?

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!news.glorb.com!news.astraweb.com!border5.newsrouter.astraweb.com!not-for-mail
From Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked?
References <4dfea558$0$29981$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>
X-Public-Key-ID 0xAC128405
X-Public-Key-Fingerprint 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35 4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
X-Public-Key-URL http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc
X-Post-From Ben Finney <bignose+hates-spam@benfinney.id.au>
Date Wed, 22 Jun 2011 10:49:37 +1000
Message-ID <877h8epu5a.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink)
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:qtmgWncgToYbPuBNKJU10WJBuDU=
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
Lines 42
Organization Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com
NNTP-Posting-Host 28b77a96.news.astraweb.com
X-Trace DXC=A`:A\@<>`PV?W?WaA<e5APL?0kYOcDh@ZW\:Hm@YlDbZSRFXlR6UfQYUGD@iN[Hd?_7?DYKCaiHm]
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8153

Show key headers only | View raw


Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> writes:

> The last couple of messages on this list <python-list@python.org> show
> up fine on the mailman archives, but are empty posts on
> comp.lang.python. Is there a problem with the mail -> usenet gateway?

I don't see empty messages through Usenet.

However, at around the time you reported this, I started seeing some
(not many) messages each day with strange mangling of the header: the
Date field showing Unix epoch, the Subject field truncated, and the From
field showing the remainder from the Subject.

Another distortion is that the summary of message size (which I think is
derived from the Lines field) shows zero for all those problematic
messages. That may indicate a link between the problems we're seeing.

For example:

=====
O  [20110621T054352:  2.0k: deathweaselx86      ]─── Is there any advantage or disadvantage to using sets over list comps to ensure a list
O  [20110621T111058:  2.8k: Steven D'Aprano     ]├─► [...]
O  [20110621T135956:  1.9k: rusi                ]└─► [...]
O  [19700101T100000:  0.0k: comps to ensure a li]*── Re: Is there any advantage or disadvantage to using sets over list
O  <19700101T100000:  0.0k: comps to ensure a li>  └─► [...]
O  [20110618T161430:  3.5k: Gregory Ewing       ]─── ANN: PyGUI 2.5.1
=====

The problematic messages in the above example are Message-ID:
<mailman.191.1308600028.1164.python-list@python.org> and
<mailman.213.1308627006.1164.python-list@python.org>. The messages, when
retrieved, have the right content and even the fields in the header
appear fine.

My news service for ‘comp.lang.python’ is currently provided from
‘astraweb.com’.

-- 
 \                             “I'm a born-again atheist.” —Gore Vidal |
  `\                                                                   |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-20 01:41 +0000
  Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked? Peter Pearson <ppearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2011-06-20 16:49 +0000
    Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-20 23:49 +0000
      Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked? Peter Pearson <ppearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2011-06-21 16:58 +0000
  Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2011-06-20 12:21 -0500
  Re: Is the mailing list to usenet gateway borked? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-06-22 10:49 +1000

csiph-web