Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #8167

Re: Security test of embedded Python

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!selfless.tophat.at!news.glorb.com!news-out.octanews.net!indigo.octanews.net!auth.beige.octanews.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Security test of embedded Python
References <mailman.258.1308703797.1164.python-list@python.org> <7xhb7i7hes.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <mailman.262.1308710118.1164.python-list@python.org>
Date Tue, 21 Jun 2011 19:40:22 -0700
Message-ID <7xei2my4fd.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink)
Organization Nightsong/Fort GNOX
User-Agent Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:iD8fK4CfrqsduuO/Cj/LLjOS+VI=
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Lines 7
NNTP-Posting-Date 21 Jun 2011 21:40:22 CDT
X-Complaints-To abuse@octanews.net
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:8167

Show key headers only | View raw

Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes:
> I'll also be looking into Pike. Unfortunately its community is far
> smaller than Python's, so security holes may be less obvious.

Actually the most obvious and widespread sandboxed language these days
is Javascript.  There's several embeddable implementations.  Maybe you
should just use one of those.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 10:49 +1000
  Re: Security test of embedded Python Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:02 -0700
    Re: Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 12:35 +1000
      Re: Security test of embedded Python Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:40 -0700
        Re: Security test of embedded Python Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-21 20:09 -0700
        Re: Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 13:26 +1000
          Re: Security test of embedded Python Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 20:42 -0700
            Re: Security test of embedded Python Dennis <daodennis@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 22:37 -0700
    Re: Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 12:44 +1000
      Re: Security test of embedded Python Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-22 19:33 +0200

csiph-web