Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #8167
| From | Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Security test of embedded Python |
| References | <mailman.258.1308703797.1164.python-list@python.org> <7xhb7i7hes.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <mailman.262.1308710118.1164.python-list@python.org> |
| Date | 2011-06-21 19:40 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <7xei2my4fd.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Nightsong/Fort GNOX |
Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> writes: > I'll also be looking into Pike. Unfortunately its community is far > smaller than Python's, so security holes may be less obvious. Actually the most obvious and widespread sandboxed language these days is Javascript. There's several embeddable implementations. Maybe you should just use one of those.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 10:49 +1000
Re: Security test of embedded Python Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:02 -0700
Re: Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 12:35 +1000
Re: Security test of embedded Python Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 19:40 -0700
Re: Security test of embedded Python Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-06-21 20:09 -0700
Re: Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 13:26 +1000
Re: Security test of embedded Python Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-06-21 20:42 -0700
Re: Security test of embedded Python Dennis <daodennis@gmail.com> - 2011-06-21 22:37 -0700
Re: Security test of embedded Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-22 12:44 +1000
Re: Security test of embedded Python Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2011-06-22 19:33 +0200
csiph-web