Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #104982
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener |
| Date | 2016-03-16 03:46 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1784840.LWdhd0IYBL@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.168.1458075301.12893.python-list@python.org> <1637296.ljfaO6m7tu@PointedEars.de> <CAPTjJmoerapysu7SNz7wp=rnUzX2nRpRmN465pfcpXGJKRWg7g@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.179.1458095672.12893.python-list@python.org> |
Gene Heskett wrote: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 19:55:52 Chris Angelico wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 10:38 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn >> > And as for second-level domains, consider for example “t.c” instead >> > of “twitter.com” as part of the short URI. >> That'll work only for the ones that you code in specifically, and >> that's only shortening your URL by 8 characters. A typical URL needing >> shortening is over 80 characters - maybe several hundred. You need to >> cut that down to a manageable length. That fundamentally cannot be >> reversed without readding information. > > And I submit that putting someone in charge of the drives organization, > and the database on that drive that the url has to dig thru, can make a > huge difference in the length of the resultant url. Maybe it’s just the late/early hour, but you’ve just lost me. Please elaborate. >> >>> And with the exception of Twitter-ish sites that place a limit on >> >>> message length, there really is *no need* for shorter URIs >> >>> nowadays. (HTTP) clients and servers are capable of processing >> >>> really long ones [1]; electronic communications media and related >> >>> software, too [2]. And data storage space as well as data >> >>> transmission has become exceptionally inexpensive. A few less >> >>> bytes there do not count. > > They may not count for that much in terms of what the user pays for > bandwidth, but see below. And some users are probably still paying for > their internet access by the minute in some locales. So they should loathe more the overhead measured in *kibibytes* and delay measured in *seconds* caused by additional HTTP requests due to redirection from “short URLs” than the few more *bytes* in longer, original URLs, yes? -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
WP-A: A New URL Shortener Vinicius Mesel <me@vmesel.com> - 2016-03-15 16:56 -0300
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-15 23:53 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-03-15 23:11 +0000
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 10:16 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-16 00:38 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 10:55 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-16 01:36 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-15 22:34 -0400
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-16 03:46 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Gene Heskett <gheskett@wdtv.com> - 2016-03-15 23:34 -0400
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-16 17:51 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-03-16 17:27 +1300
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 16:43 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 19:27 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 13:40 -0700
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-17 22:15 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 21:49 -0700
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-19 14:03 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 16:19 -0700
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-03-16 01:22 +0100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 20:40 -0700
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-03-15 23:40 +0000
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 10:48 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2016-03-16 00:31 +0000
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 11:34 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-17 23:08 +1100
Re: WP-A: A New URL Shortener Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2016-03-17 12:47 +0000
csiph-web