Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #94184

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

X-Received by 10.129.91.137 with SMTP id p131mr30557102ywb.0.1437355516964; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received by 10.182.120.199 with SMTP id le7mr242298obb.5.1437355516888; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
Path csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!enother.net!enother.net!peer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!z61no2092646qge.0!news-out.google.com!t2ni15776igk.0!nntp.google.com!pg9no2273319igb.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Sun, 19 Jul 2015 18:25:16 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <d434f6f5-d216-454e-a4be-e0050c8b322c@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=70.196.77.157; posting-account=h3aEwQoAAACiuqX-oR3gvCVFm8lLHoWj
NNTP-Posting-Host 70.196.77.157
References <moenuj$f11$1@ger.gmane.org> <CABicbJ+Fy=Jhj63VnOmS3BJD3He+i3J+P+ASMmjJDMi9X7rt-w@mail.gmail.com> <mof14q$b47$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.713.1437313378.3674.python-list@python.org> <87y4icxh4r.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.736.1437332518.3674.python-list@python.org> <3aa144a1-79f9-4008-bb24-f10761562f4d@googlegroups.com> <09a9e835-a826-4fc5-b101-246e4341c046@googlegroups.com> <0718ce1d-5560-49d8-832b-5d71404e31fc@googlegroups.com> <d434f6f5-d216-454e-a4be-e0050c8b322c@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent G2/1.0
MIME-Version 1.0
Message-ID <147c13aa-af49-4789-a844-ab3ed6f6f99d@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
From Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
Injection-Date Mon, 20 Jul 2015 01:25:16 +0000
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Received-Bytes 2477
X-Received-Body-CRC 886622897
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:94184

Show key headers only | View raw

On Sunday, July 19, 2015 at 7:45:43 PM UTC-5, bream...@gmail.com wrote:
> I have no negative perception of 2.7, it simply no longer
> interests me, to repeat in the same way that it no longer
> interests some core devs.

Your apathy towards Py2 will not shield you from the
collateral damage caused by it's demise.

What matters is what the *WORLD* thinks about Python. And if
the global "perception" is that: "Python is buggy", or that:
"the python community is fractured" -> then all hope in
widespread future adoption is gone! Then, both Py2 and Py3
die. Then, you will be forced to use another language? 

  GOT IT?

This is *NOT* about you, or me, this is about the
*PERCEPTION* of Python within the *ENTIRE* programming
community.

> are you still too busy working on your fork, RickedPython?  

I've never seen you before. Are you a regular hiding behind
a fake name?

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 14:42 +0100
  Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 18:10 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 17:38 +0100
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 19:14 +0200
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 18:54 +0100
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 11:28 -0700
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 11:44 -0700
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 12:13 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 13:21 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:36 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2015-07-19 21:07 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-22 00:40 +0100
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:46 +0200
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 22:00 -0700
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:36 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 13:01 -0600
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 12:28 -0700
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 13:36 -0700
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 14:27 -0700
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 17:45 -0700
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 18:25 -0700
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-19 22:05 +0200
        Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 21:28 +0100
          Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-20 00:10 +0200
            Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-19 23:51 +0100
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-07-20 01:23 +0200
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-07-20 01:27 +0100
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 17:49 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? breamoreboy@gmail.com - 2015-07-19 18:26 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 18:35 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 13:12 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 21:30 -0600
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 15:59 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 20:58 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-21 18:33 +1000
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 19:58 -0700
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-07-19 23:33 -0600
                Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2015-07-20 00:39 -0600
              Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:49 +1000
      Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-07-20 12:32 +1000
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:06 +0200
    Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2015-07-20 08:10 +0200

csiph-web