Re: Lettuce vs Behave

X-Received	by 10.180.96.133 with SMTP id ds5mr1173852wib.0.1377872614080; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:23:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received	by 10.152.18.232 with SMTP id z8mr1066lad.29.1377872613215; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!news.ecp.fr!feeder1.cambriumusenet.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!209.85.212.216.MISMATCH!l4no981499wiy.1!news-out.google.com!v3ni3029wiv.1!nntp.google.com!l4no981494wiy.1!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Date	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 07:23:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To	<c7021aad-25b1-45e2-bced-bca40d765b7b@googlegroups.com>
Complaints-To	groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info	glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=108.2.75.218; posting-account=gUIxDQoAAADaq8gWR4V9mqh4k4U-NKqm
NNTP-Posting-Host	108.2.75.218
References	<c7021aad-25b1-45e2-bced-bca40d765b7b@googlegroups.com>
User-Agent	G2/1.0
MIME-Version	1.0
Message-ID	<0c4e6d65-334d-4de7-8c96-87ba4e5f14bc@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: Lettuce vs Behave
From	jumpmanlane@myopera.com
Injection-Date	Fri, 30 Aug 2013 14:23:34 +0000
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:53297

Show key headers only | View raw

On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:15:01 PM UTC-4, cutems93 wrote:
> I found that BDD is a very good philosophy for coding and checking my program, and I decided to use either of these two software. However, it seems these two are very similar in the way they function. As professionals, what do you prefer and why?

+1 for Behave

-J

Thread

Lettuce vs Behave cutems93 <ms2597@cornell.edu> - 2013-08-16 10:15 -0700
  Re: Lettuce vs Behave Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-29 16:12 +1000
  Re: Lettuce vs Behave jumpmanlane@myopera.com - 2013-08-30 07:23 -0700
    Re: Lettuce vs Behave Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-31 08:58 +1000

csiph-web