Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #52598 > unrolled thread

Lettuce vs Behave

Started bycutems93 <ms2597@cornell.edu>
First post2013-08-16 10:15 -0700
Last post2013-08-31 08:58 +1000
Articles 4 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  Lettuce vs Behave cutems93 <ms2597@cornell.edu> - 2013-08-16 10:15 -0700
    Re: Lettuce vs Behave Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-29 16:12 +1000
    Re: Lettuce vs Behave jumpmanlane@myopera.com - 2013-08-30 07:23 -0700
      Re: Lettuce vs Behave Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-08-31 08:58 +1000

#52598 — Lettuce vs Behave

Fromcutems93 <ms2597@cornell.edu>
Date2013-08-16 10:15 -0700
SubjectLettuce vs Behave
Message-ID<c7021aad-25b1-45e2-bced-bca40d765b7b@googlegroups.com>
I found that BDD is a very good philosophy for coding and checking my program, and I decided to use either of these two software. However, it seems these two are very similar in the way they function. As professionals, what do you prefer and why?

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#53216

FromBen Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Date2013-08-29 16:12 +1000
Message-ID<mailman.344.1377756793.19984.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#52598
cutems93 <ms2597@cornell.edu> writes:

> However, it seems these two [Lettuce and Behave] are very similar in
> the way they function. As professionals, what do you prefer and why?

I haven't used both, and have only begun using Behave.

The Behave documentation compares it with Lettuce here
<URL:http://pythonhosted.org/behave/comparison.html#lettuce>.

-- 
 \        “Odious ideas are not entitled to hide from criticism behind |
  `\          the human shield of their believers' feelings.” —Richard |
_o__)                                                         Stallman |
Ben Finney

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53297

Fromjumpmanlane@myopera.com
Date2013-08-30 07:23 -0700
Message-ID<0c4e6d65-334d-4de7-8c96-87ba4e5f14bc@googlegroups.com>
In reply to#52598
On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:15:01 PM UTC-4, cutems93 wrote:
> I found that BDD is a very good philosophy for coding and checking my program, and I decided to use either of these two software. However, it seems these two are very similar in the way they function. As professionals, what do you prefer and why?

+1 for Behave

-J

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#53313

FromBen Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au>
Date2013-08-31 08:58 +1000
Message-ID<mailman.398.1377903500.19984.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#53297
jumpmanlane@myopera.com writes:

> On Friday, August 16, 2013 1:15:01 PM UTC-4, cutems93 wrote:
> > As professionals, what do you prefer and why?
>
> +1 for Behave

And why?

-- 
 \              “In the long run, the utility of all non-Free software |
  `\      approaches zero. All non-Free software is a dead end.” —Mark |
_o__)                                                    Pilgrim, 2006 |
Ben Finney

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web