Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3075
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
|---|---|
| From | Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> |
| Subject | Re: duplex ? |
| References | <slrnoht13h.2hh.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> <MPG.3388a79feaca7ad8989919@usenet.plus.net> |
| Message-ID | <slrnohtmcq.17r.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> (permalink) |
| Date | 2017-05-19 11:40 +0000 |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
On 2017-05-19, ken <ken@spamcop.net> wrote: > > Its unfortunate that you find the PLRM difficult to work with, > in my experience its one of the best specifications I've read. Yes, it's pretty good. The best I've ever seen is Programming in Lua, but that is a totally unfair comparison because Lua is so much leaner. > Duplexing is clearly defined in the PLRM, assuming your printer conforms > to the specification in this regard (which is by no means certain) you > would need to send something like : > <</Duplex true>> setpagedevice That itself was very helpful :-) I had been stuck in the DSC section. So this is my current best-effort test-file : %!PS-Adobe-3.0 % PLRM ed.2 p. 674 %%Requirements: duplex %%IncludeFeature: duplex %%BeginFeature: duplex %%EndComments %%BeginProlog %%EndProlog % printer description files see pp. 227, 229, 251, 613 % p.235 p.669 %%BeginSetup %%BeginFeature *Duplex True << /Duplex true >> setpagedevice %%EndFeature %%EndSetup %%Page: 1 1 %%BeginPageSetup %%EndPageSetup 298 421 40 0 360 arc fill showpage %%Page: 2 2 %%BeginPageSetup %%EndPageSetup 298 421 40 0 360 arc stroke showpage %%EOF but it still doesn't print duplex :-( lpd does see the printer correctly as a HL5440D. Peter -- Peter Billam www.pjb.com.au www.pjb.com.au/comp/contact.html
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
duplex ? Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2017-05-19 05:36 +0000
Re: duplex ? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2017-05-19 07:57 +0100
Re: duplex ? Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2017-05-19 11:40 +0000
Re: duplex ? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2017-05-19 19:19 +0100
Re: duplex ? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-05-19 21:26 -0400
Re: duplex ? Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2017-05-21 07:18 +0000
Re: duplex ? John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2017-05-23 21:40 -0700
csiph-web