Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3076
| From | ken <ken@spamcop.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: duplex ? |
| Date | 2017-05-19 19:19 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <MPG.338947797bd31dc398991a@usenet.plus.net> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnoht13h.2hh.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> <MPG.3388a79feaca7ad8989919@usenet.plus.net> <slrnohtmcq.17r.peter@box8.pjb.com.au> |
In article <slrnohtmcq.17r.peter@box8.pjb.com.au>, peter@www.pjb.com.au says... > but it still doesn't print duplex :-( Not a lot I can szay really, that ought to be enough for a standard PostScript implementation. Of course, not all implementations are standard. > lpd does see the printer correctly as a HL5440D. So you are running Linux ? Any chance you could run a Windows VM, or borrow a Windows machine to install the printer driver and see if you can get it to work there ? If so you could capture the PostScirpt and look at it to see what it does. Dumb question but you are sure its a duplex equipped variant ? And the duplex unit works ? (I know, it says D, but worth checking) Ken
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
duplex ? Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2017-05-19 05:36 +0000
Re: duplex ? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2017-05-19 07:57 +0100
Re: duplex ? Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2017-05-19 11:40 +0000
Re: duplex ? ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2017-05-19 19:19 +0100
Re: duplex ? tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2017-05-19 21:26 -0400
Re: duplex ? Peter Billam <peter@www.pjb.com.au> - 2017-05-21 07:18 +0000
Re: duplex ? John Reiser <jreiserfl@comcast.net> - 2017-05-23 21:40 -0700
csiph-web