Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #534
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Sierpinski |
| Date | Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:09:35 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | U.C. Berkeley Math. Department. |
| Lines | 13 |
| Message-ID | <slrnjfk9fv.8sb.nospam-abuse@panda.math.berkeley.edu> (permalink) |
| References | <111db8ba-d74d-4641-9be8-b8396eb7b74a@f11g2000yql.googlegroups.com> <b9b6fdd9-ffa2-4a63-adbf-bb065c1e4f58@p13g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> <slrnjfcvak.km1.nospam-abuse@panda.math.berkeley.edu> <4794ae67-2feb-4de1-8326-877301c0adc5@o9g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <slrnjffa4i.ndd.nospam-abuse@panda.math.berkeley.edu> <bf65e1e7-5e38-479c-8fad-c8a46982835a@p16g2000yqd.googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 27 Dec 2011 20:09:35 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="EKxe1u6MqDDGLNz4aDdAzA"; logging-data="12363"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18JPg+/mMgDTyd+oVa0QNvD" |
| User-Agent | slrn/0.9.8.1pl1 (Linux) |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:UCG0+dpDbDnErcK7tpsm98Rj8FY= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.postscript:534 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2011-12-26, luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> wrote: >> To be fair, the real Sierpinski contains exactly 0 grams of ink. So a >> fair representation would use 1 setgray ;-). I must say that the >> results with positive amount of ink look much better. ;-) ;-) ;-) > > The same is true of all points and lines, considered geometrically. Very true; I got my Hausdorff dimensions off by 1. I realized this only after posting the message, by thinking why your curves do not take infinite weight of ink. ;-) Thanks, Ilya
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Koch snowflake using Lindenmeyer System luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-23 14:32 -0800
Re: Koch snowflake using Lindenmeyer System luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-24 03:59 -0800
Re: Sierpinski Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-12-25 01:33 +0000
Re: Sierpinski luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-24 21:22 -0800
Re: Sierpinski Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-12-25 22:49 +0000
Re: Sierpinski luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-25 19:19 -0800
Re: Sierpinski Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-12-27 20:09 +0000
Re: Sierpinski tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-26 21:47 -0500
Re: Sierpinski Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-12-27 20:13 +0000
Re: Sierpinski tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-27 16:37 -0500
Re: Sierpinski tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-26 22:26 -0500
Re: Sierpinski tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-26 23:24 -0500
Re: Sierpinski Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-12-27 20:22 +0000
Re: Sierpinski tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-27 16:29 -0500
Re: [OT] Sierpinski etc Ilya Zakharevich <nospam-abuse@ilyaz.org> - 2011-12-28 22:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Sierpinski etc tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-28 19:53 -0500
Re: Sierpinski etc luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-28 23:35 -0800
Re: Sierpinski etc tlvp <mPiOsUcB.EtLlLvEp@att.net> - 2011-12-29 12:07 -0500
??? using Lindenmeyer System luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-27 22:55 -0800
Re: ???(broccoli) using Lindenmeyer System luser- -droog <mijoryx@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-31 15:32 -0800
csiph-web