Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #2904
| From | Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript |
| Date | 2016-10-18 10:13 -0600 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <nu5hm5$k6i$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <ntrea3$okg$1@reader2.panix.com> <nu0ai1$ikr$1@dont-email.me> <040899ac-5cf7-40f5-9aa8-b1db05a900b6@googlegroups.com> <94a0f333-dcc9-4a76-8da9-57595c1433a7@googlegroups.com> <0e89f7c1-08ef-4a1d-9fc8-8d92fd687e03@googlegroups.com> |
Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: > On Tuesday, October 18, 2016 at 2:44:24 PM UTC+13, Alan wrote: >> On Monday, October 17, 2016 at 9:07:05 PM UTC-4, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote: >> >>> PostScript still wouldn’t be as good a graphics language as Python. >> I don't even know what this claim means. > > It means what it says. The key is the definition of "good". If you define good to mean "supported by Adobe" then the answer becomes clear. Other definitions lead to different answers. Different computer languages have different strengths and weaknesses. Discussions about which are good, better or best go nowhere. -- Regards, Martin Leese E-mail: please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID Web: http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-05 18:24 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 14:50 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript jdaw1 <jdawiseman@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 15:45 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-06 17:44 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2016-10-07 08:47 +0100
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 15:08 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:47 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Mark Carroll <mtbc@bcs.org> - 2016-10-08 12:34 +0100
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 18:39 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-07 19:07 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 15:32 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-12 17:06 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript rodd@panix.com (Rod Dorman) - 2016-10-13 19:07 +0000
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-13 15:02 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript rodd@panix.com (Rod Dorman) - 2016-10-14 20:13 +0000
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-14 14:39 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2016-10-16 10:40 -0600
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:06 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Alan <alan.isaac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 18:44 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-17 22:43 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Martin Leese <please@see.Web.for.e-mail.INVALID> - 2016-10-18 10:13 -0600
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 15:28 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 15:35 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2016-10-18 23:05 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-10-19 19:23 +0200
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 17:17 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:18 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 18:10 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Ross Presser <rpresser@gmail.com> - 2016-10-21 09:14 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Markus Triska <triska@metalevel.at> - 2016-10-19 20:55 +0200
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 17:57 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-24 16:54 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-10-25 16:26 +0200
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-25 10:32 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-10-25 21:06 +0200
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-11-14 15:15 -0800
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-11-16 00:17 +0100
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-11-21 18:37 +0100
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Carlos <angus@quovadis.com.ar> - 2016-11-21 18:39 +0100
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Markus Triska <triska@metalevel.at> - 2016-10-25 20:52 +0200
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Alan <alan.isaac@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 16:41 -0700
Re: Getting Rid Of PostScript Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrencedo99@gmail.com> - 2016-10-19 17:15 -0700
csiph-web