Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.pascal.misc > #1731
| From | rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.pascal.misc |
| Subject | My Parallel Sort Library |
| Date | 2017-05-06 17:43 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <oelfsg$99a$4@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello......... I have implemented a Parallel hybrid divide-and-conquer merge algorithm that performs 0.9-5.8 times better than sequential merge, on a quad-core processor, with larger arrays outperforming by over 5 times. Parallel processing combined with a hybrid algorithm approach provides a powerful high performance result. The idea: Let's assume we want to merge sorted arrays X and Y. Select X[m] median element in X. Elements in X[ .. m-1] are less than or equal to X[m]. Using binary search find index k of the first element in Y greater than X[m]. Thus Y[ .. k-1] are less than or equal to X[m] as well. Elements in X[m+1..] are greater than or equal to X[m] and Y[k .. ] are greater. So merge(X, Y) can be defined as concat(merge(X[ .. m-1], Y[ .. k-1]), X[m], merge(X[m+1.. ], Y[k .. ])) now we can recursively in parallel do merge(X[ .. m-1], Y[ .. k-1]) and merge(X[m+1 .. ], Y[k .. ]) and then concat results. And now ParallelSort library gives better performance and scalability. You can download my powerful Parallel Sort Library from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/parallel-sort-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.lang.pascal.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
My Parallel Sort Library rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> - 2017-05-06 17:43 -0400
csiph-web