Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.pascal.misc > #1732
| From | rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.pascal.misc |
| Subject | I was thinking about Transactional memory more.. |
| Date | 2017-05-06 21:16 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <oelsan$b1t$5@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
Hello.......... I was thinking about Transactional memory more.. Here is the problem of optimistic transactional memory: If there is more conflicts between reads and writes you have to rollback etc. and this will be less energy efficient than pessimistic locking mechanisms and it will be less faster. So i think that my C++ Synchronization objects library is still useful.. You can download it from: https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library Thank you, Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Back to comp.lang.pascal.misc | Previous | Next | Find similar
I was thinking about Transactional memory more.. rami17 <rami17@rami17.net> - 2017-05-06 21:16 -0400
csiph-web