Re: Statement-Continuation Rule

From	Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.javascript
Subject	Re: Statement-Continuation Rule
Date	2024-02-23 00:49 +0100
Message-ID	<ur8mhl$ftfd$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References	<uq1bhn$1lp15$4@dont-email.me> <ur7860$f3dd$1@solani.org> <ur87of$1rr1$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

No syntactical doubts, only semantical doubts:

 > So method chaining might not always satisfied the
 > same expectations about being a more "functional" approach.

Guido von Rossum suggest to not always use method chaining:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038855.html

Lawrence D'Oliveiro schrieb:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:37:52 +0100, Mild Shock wrote:
> 
>> But I have my doubts.
> 
> Show us your non-method-chained-style version, then.
>

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Statement-Continuation Rule Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-22 11:37 +0100
  Re: Statement-Continuation Rule Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-02-22 19:36 +0000
    Re: Statement-Continuation Rule Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2024-02-23 00:49 +0100
      Re: Statement-Continuation Rule Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-02-23 01:40 +0000
        Re: Statement-Continuation Rule John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2024-02-23 11:55 +0000

csiph-web