Path: csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!reader5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.javascript
Subject: Re: Statement-Continuation Rule
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2024 00:49:08 +0100
Message-ID: <ur8mhl$ftfd$1@solani.org>
References: <uq1bhn$1lp15$4@dont-email.me> <ur7860$f3dd$1@solani.org> <ur87of$1rr1$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2024 23:49:10 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: solani.org; logging-data="521709"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@news.solani.org"
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/91.0 SeaMonkey/2.53.18.1
Cancel-Lock: sha1:vexdeowavlHwK6bCmOHJFjWH/rE=
In-Reply-To: <ur87of$1rr1$1@dont-email.me>
X-User-ID: eJwNy0cBwDAMA0BMViwPOB4Jfwjt/Y/HxMbVaMrHFzirLbPQVA+Uc5vlwNZ2XtzilQ4iYdnjzjcoIOYfyQ9QORU9
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:124276

No syntactical doubts, only semantical doubts:

 > So method chaining might not always satisfied the
 > same expectations about being a more "functional" approach.

Guido von Rossum suggest to not always use method chaining:

https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2003-October/038855.html

Lawrence D'Oliveiro schrieb:
> On Thu, 22 Feb 2024 11:37:52 +0100, Mild Shock wrote:
> 
>> But I have my doubts.
> 
> Show us your non-method-chained-style version, then.
>