Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #7527
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!gegeweb.org!news.chainon-marquant.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder2-2.proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool2.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" |
| Message-ID | <5478003.ScrLVSd4Jv@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Tue, 18 Oct 2011 11:12:40 +0200 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.11 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7Bit |
| Subject | Re: Objects comparaison ? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <1k93ek2.1xghqcy1upjvv5N%unbewusst.sein@fai.invalid> <j77bob$rq6$1@dont-email.me> <1783522.fYvYJRLvp5@PointedEars.de> <j77erf$j8g$1@dont-email.me> <1411612.7OFYzboFZ6@PointedEars.de> <ace50d65-1357-49c9-83da-cc72bddc4382@11g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <2326223.jLKWLtnpvF@PointedEars.de> <e0b407d3-9663-4c23-9863-5969374eaa2d@e37g2000yqa.googlegroups.com> <2065619.34vx2sxqLb@PointedEars.de> <d66a4e0d-c27d-4fcf-9e1d-74e15613d52a@t38g2000prg.googlegroups.com> <2995463.SPkdTlGXAF@PointedEars.de> <b2196b98-93ac-49fc-bca5-61ae8fafee24@r2g2000prh.googlegroups.com> <2314707.NYtdq5378b@PointedEars.de> <XgFvB6Cws$mOFwCZ@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> <j7hdvn$4ai$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 47 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 18 Oct 2011 11:12:40 CEST |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | ef52e659.newsspool1.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC=jbH0ZgUgS]<lIh70@<QIE7ic==]BZ:af>4Fo<]lROoR1<`=YMgDjhg2D^`i3[Q<Q2>DZm8W4\YJN<b@mF9jNikd5_dXMBNGELE1H@\kC1=flc3 |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:7527 |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Show key headers only | View raw
Andreas Bergmaier wrote:
> John G Harris schrieb:
>> On Sun, 16 Oct 2011 at 21:59:39, in comp.lang.javascript, Thomas
>> 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>> Object.equals = function(obj1, obj2) {...}
>>
>> Attaching a global function (note it has two parameters) to Object is a
>> very bad idea.
>
> Why that? I'd say it just belongs to there as other Object methods (like
> keys() oder defineProperty(), see
>
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Object#Methods).
The risk involved is that Object.equals() could be specified as a built-in
later, maybe differently, and implemented. It might or might not be
specified as read-only then, and if not, this would overwrite the built-in
definition.
Once specified and not implemented, however, such properties should be safe
to be added like that, so that the efficiency of the native code can be
leveraged without having to change the calling code. It requires the user-
defined fallback to follow the Specification literally, though.
> And what do you mean with "it has parameters"? Attaching a function
> without parameters, or attaching a non-function property would be OK?
He is confusing this with Object.prototype.equals(obj1, obj2), which would
be a rather bad idea indeed, for two reasons:
First, it would show up in for-in iteration as it would be enumerable (and
it remains to be seen how widely Object.defineProperty() is implemented, so
that this can be prevented).
Second, the conflict between the `this' value and one of the arguments needs
to be resolved: Which value refers to the object being compared against? (I
would opt for the second argument to override the default `this' value, so
that it can be optional. Cf. Array.prototype.filter(), e.g.)
PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Objects comparaison ? unbewusst.sein@fai.invalid (Une Bévue) - 2011-10-13 20:20 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-10-13 21:47 +0300
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-13 21:21 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-10-13 22:40 +0300
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-13 21:46 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2011-10-13 13:11 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-14 01:26 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2011-10-14 12:41 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-15 21:37 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-15 15:51 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2011-10-15 21:28 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-16 11:41 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2011-10-16 09:05 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-16 21:59 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-17 10:53 +0100
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-17 07:02 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2011-10-17 16:27 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? dhtml <dhtmlkitchen@gmail.com> - 2011-10-17 21:28 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-18 11:12 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-18 15:23 +0100
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-18 19:48 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-19 17:08 +0100
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-20 23:58 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-20 15:46 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-18 10:55 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-18 15:59 +0100
Re: Objects comparaison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-18 19:33 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-10-18 14:05 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-18 16:51 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-18 17:21 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 04:40 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-19 16:41 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 17:14 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-19 18:33 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-10-23 11:43 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 15:32 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-19 16:54 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 17:32 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2011-10-19 18:39 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-19 16:32 +0100
Re: Objects comparaison ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 14:18 -0700
Re: Objects comparaison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 15:46 -0700
Objects comparison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-20 16:28 +0100
Re: Objects comparison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-20 12:23 -0700
Re: Objects comparison ? Antony Scriven <adscriven@gmail.com> - 2011-10-20 15:04 -0700
Re: Objects comparison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-21 15:38 +0100
Re: Objects comparison ? Andreas Bergmaier <andber93@web.de> - 2011-10-22 19:40 +0200
Re: Objects comparison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-23 11:49 +0100
Re: Objects comparison ? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2011-10-24 19:00 +0200
Re: Objects comparison ? Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2011-10-21 05:29 -0700
Re: Objects comparison ? John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2011-10-21 16:30 +0100
Re: Objects comparaison ? Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2011-10-18 18:06 +0300
Re: Objects comparaison ? Jake Jarvis <pig_in_shoes@yahoo.com> - 2011-10-18 17:43 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? unbewusst.sein@fai.invalid (Une Bévue) - 2011-10-14 06:11 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-10-14 08:07 +0300
Re: Objects comparaison ? unbewusst.sein@fai.invalid (Une Bévue) - 2011-10-14 07:31 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2011-10-14 08:59 +0300
Re: Objects comparaison ? unbewusst.sein@fai.invalid (Une Bévue) - 2011-10-14 08:36 +0200
Re: Objects comparaison ? unbewusst.sein@fai.invalid (Une Bévue) - 2011-10-14 08:35 +0200
csiph-web