Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38851
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 |
| Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:49:31 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 29 |
| Message-ID | <q82o7b$59l$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnqa9lo4.cfl.avl@logic.at> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:49:47 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="39fd5f661ec41bf692e70cf0b8c17908"; logging-data="5429"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1801gk3lVxQ8MVhuCd8aJNg" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:YW9iLm4ZQfr9NDuoUQDQs5xllXw= |
| In-Reply-To | <slrnqa9lo4.cfl.avl@logic.at> |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| X-Antivirus | AVG (VPS 190403-2, 04/03/2019), Outbound message |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38851 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 2019-04-03 17:53, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > In Java up to 8 DefaultTableModel had a method getDataVector() > that returned a raw Vector. > > My application's custom TableModel overrode the method to return > a Vector<MyRowType>, where MyRowType provided direct type-safe > accessors for each column. > > In Java 11 it seems to have changed to returning a Vector of > raw Vectors. > > At first glance this seems just goofy to me, because that doesn't > really make it type-safe (it still involves a raw type), and it even > prevents me from making it type-safe myself. > > I hope, someone here can provide me with a second glance that > clarifies the rationale behind the change. > Well, /unless/, indeed, your intent is to override, it strikes me that: Object cell = tableModel.getDataVector().get(0).get(0) is more user-friendly than Object cell = ((Vector<?>) tableModel.getDataVector().get(0)).get(0) -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-04-03 15:53 +0000
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Patrick Roemer <sangamon@netcologne.de> - 2019-04-03 18:37 +0200
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-04-03 16:41 +0000
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-04-03 12:44 -0400
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2019-04-03 17:33 +0000
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-03 11:22 -0700
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-04-03 18:49 +0200
Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-03 10:34 -0700
csiph-web