Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Daniele Futtorovic Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: DefaultTableModel.getDataVector() and Java 11 Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 18:49:31 +0200 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2019 16:49:47 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="39fd5f661ec41bf692e70cf0b8c17908"; logging-data="5429"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1801gk3lVxQ8MVhuCd8aJNg" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:YW9iLm4ZQfr9NDuoUQDQs5xllXw= In-Reply-To: X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Content-Language: en-US X-Antivirus: AVG (VPS 190403-2, 04/03/2019), Outbound message Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38851 On 2019-04-03 17:53, Andreas Leitgeb wrote: > In Java up to 8 DefaultTableModel had a method getDataVector() > that returned a raw Vector. > > My application's custom TableModel overrode the method to return > a Vector, where MyRowType provided direct type-safe > accessors for each column. > > In Java 11 it seems to have changed to returning a Vector of > raw Vectors. > > At first glance this seems just goofy to me, because that doesn't > really make it type-safe (it still involves a raw type), and it even > prevents me from making it type-safe myself. > > I hope, someone here can provide me with a second glance that > clarifies the rationale behind the change. > Well, /unless/, indeed, your intent is to override, it strikes me that: Object cell = tableModel.getDataVector().get(0).get(0) is more user-friendly than Object cell = ((Vector) tableModel.getDataVector().get(0)).get(0) -- DF.