Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38839

Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder()

Path	csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED.xV/6gj+grSZn0+TB/DGTcw.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail
From	Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder()
Date	Sat, 30 Mar 2019 11:21:18 +0000
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	12
Message-ID	<q7njfd$114i$1@gioia.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<q7lbvc$152e$1@gioia.aioe.org> <9089289e-c140-4a3c-9480-b2ada51ffa22@googlegroups.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host	xV/6gj+grSZn0+TB/DGTcw.user.gioia.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2
Content-Language	en-GB
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38839

Show key headers only | View raw

On 29/03/2019 20:20, Eric Douglas wrote:
> Define better.  Are you concerned with appearance or performance?

I guess that was an "up in the air" question indeed. I haven't use Java
in my last few jobs (10+ years), but did use Java before that. So my
knowledge is mostly on old syntax and libraries. I'm trying to get up to
speed with "the new way of doing things", even though the old way will
most likely still work.

Regards,
  Graeme

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 15:01 +0000
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 11:19 -0400
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 16:42 +0000
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 13:47 -0400
        Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 13:53 -0400
        Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2019-03-29 19:42 +0100
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-29 16:53 +0000
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-29 10:19 -0700
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Jukka Lahtinen <jtfjdehf@hotmail.com.invalid> - 2019-03-30 11:23 +0200
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-30 11:16 +0000
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-03-29 13:20 -0700
    Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Graeme Geldenhuys <graemeg@example.net> - 2019-03-30 11:21 +0000
      Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2019-04-01 04:56 -0700
  Re: Interview question - better solution for MergePurgeAndReverseOrder() bursejan@gmail.com - 2019-03-29 15:40 -0700

csiph-web