Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8458

Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization

Show all headers | View raw

On Sat, 01 Oct 2011 21:13:40 +0200, Robert Klemme wrote:

> On 10/01/2011 06:19 PM, Lew wrote:
>> Giovanni Azua wrote:
>>> I have this lite Client-Server framework based on Blocking IO using
>>> classic java.net.* Sockets (must develop it myself for a grad course
>>> project). The way I am using to pass data over the Sockets is via
>>> Serialization i.e. ObjectOutputStream#writeObject(...) and
>>> ObjectInputStream#readObject(...) I was wondering if anyone can
>>> recommend a Serialization framework that would outperform the vanilla
>>> Java default Serialization?
>>>
>> But you will be transmitting data via a format that omits the object
>> graph overhead and focuses on just the data to share.  The object-graph
>> knowledge is coded into the application and need not be transferred.
>>
>> XML is awesome for this kind of task.
> 
> http://www.json.org/ might also be a good alternative which - depending
> on format etc. - can be less verbose.  See http://json.org/example.html
> 

JSON is convenient for JavaScript heads, it is not human readable,
this is one reason why XML exists in the first place. JSON was
a mistake, instead of coming up with an arcane hacked syntax
to replace XML; JavaScript should have been improved to handle
XML.


-- 
// This is my opinion.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-01 14:46 +0200
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 09:19 -0700
    Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-01 21:13 +0200
      Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-10-01 14:35 -0500
        Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-02 11:07 +0200
        Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-03 11:43 -0700
    Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-03 19:24 +0100
      Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-04 02:45 -0700
      Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 08:55 -0700
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-01 09:48 -0700
    Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-04 02:51 -0700
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-02 11:10 +0200
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-03 19:15 +0100
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-02 11:50 +0000

csiph-web