Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8496
| From | Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization |
| Date | 2011-10-03 19:15 +0100 |
| Organization | Stack Usenet News Service |
| Message-ID | <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110031910060.30829@urchin.earth.li> (permalink) |
| References | <CAACD85F.81B3%bravegag@hotmail.com> |
On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Giovanni Azua wrote: > I was wondering if anyone can recommend a Serialization framework that > would outperform the vanilla Java default Serialization? Swords not words: https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki/ I sent them a patch to add JBoss Serialization a while ago, but they haven't taken it. I should try again now the project is on GitHub. > I remember JBoss Middleware implementation having some Serialization > framework for this very same reason ... have to check that too. It's pretty good. More or less plug-compatible with JDK serialization at the API level (as in, it doesn't need schema generation or weird interfaces or anything), and much faster. From what i remember of my benchmarks, it was faster than any of the textual formats, and only a bit slower than the schema-based binary formats like Protocol Buffers. tom -- Now I am thoroughly confused. -- Colin Brace sums up RT3090 support in Linux
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-01 14:46 +0200
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 09:19 -0700
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-01 21:13 +0200
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-10-01 14:35 -0500
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-02 11:07 +0200
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-03 11:43 -0700
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-03 19:24 +0100
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-04 02:45 -0700
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 08:55 -0700
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-01 09:48 -0700
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-04 02:51 -0700
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-02 11:10 +0200
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-03 19:15 +0100
Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-02 11:50 +0000
csiph-web