Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #8496

Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization

From Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization
Date 2011-10-03 19:15 +0100
Organization Stack Usenet News Service
Message-ID <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110031910060.30829@urchin.earth.li> (permalink)
References <CAACD85F.81B3%bravegag@hotmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw


On Sat, 1 Oct 2011, Giovanni Azua wrote:

> I was wondering if anyone can recommend a Serialization framework that 
> would outperform the vanilla Java default Serialization?

Swords not words:

https://github.com/eishay/jvm-serializers/wiki/

I sent them a patch to add JBoss Serialization a while ago, but they 
haven't taken it. I should try again now the project is on GitHub.

> I remember JBoss Middleware implementation having some Serialization 
> framework for this very same reason ... have to check that too.

It's pretty good. More or less plug-compatible with JDK serialization at 
the API level (as in, it doesn't need schema generation or weird 
interfaces or anything), and much faster. From what i remember of my 
benchmarks, it was faster than any of the textual formats, and only a bit 
slower than the schema-based binary formats like Protocol Buffers.

tom

-- 
Now I am thoroughly confused. -- Colin Brace sums up RT3090 support
in Linux

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Giovanni Azua <bravegag@hotmail.com> - 2011-10-01 14:46 +0200
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-01 09:19 -0700
    Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-01 21:13 +0200
      Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-10-01 14:35 -0500
        Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-02 11:07 +0200
        Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-03 11:43 -0700
    Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-03 19:24 +0100
      Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-04 02:45 -0700
      Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-10-04 08:55 -0700
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization markspace <-@.> - 2011-10-01 09:48 -0700
    Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-10-04 02:51 -0700
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-10-02 11:10 +0200
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-10-03 19:15 +0100
  Re: Low-latency alternative to Java Object Serialization Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2011-10-02 11:50 +0000

csiph-web