Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19761

Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK?

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "SL@maxis" <ecp_gen@my-rialto.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK?
Date Fri, 16 Nov 2012 09:23:12 +0800
Organization albasani.net
Lines 26
Message-ID <op.wnud4yrfwv4027@sl-home> (permalink)
References <k8082k$fmr$1@news.albasani.net> <50a3a6ea$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <k80j5b$o67$1@speranza.aioe.org> <50a3d194$0$289$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <1ime9q5hlhcfs.x8wnfo60hr9g$.dlg@40tude.net> <k81l6c$oh3$1@news.albasani.net> <k83sma$3qm$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net kOs1kp+7zB+bs3c/WCNNtWQMslKW2f5NEIvA4UpQ0XFuCV7XnVJAGqZYUylqZkFRz0TT1d+Aw0qS78+Y12IwW6mPUINh0ZHsrCkpSo+FVBOiX/HYeSiQIzpMMwjh0bwZ
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 16 Nov 2012 01:23:19 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="zRwBQDjQQM7C0mMl+6JMHdz34VG2RKAHQBBPBtvPkhQwkf8Kfz5ZxsbEexZrgAOA3AoB+CzRgE9JdTGnTe7SUsw4n2fSaq69EblHOVVXD4cBSiTzL1kXMSRO70f36anX"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent Opera Mail/11.00 (Win32)
Cancel-Lock sha1:giDQcrasTgJ/2eFX852pj4S8dGU=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:19761

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, 16 Nov 2012 07:08:58 +0800, Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> wrote:

>
> Wrong. Typical 64 bit processors have either a 36 bit or a 40 bit  
> physical address bus (40 bits are 1 TB, an almost incredible amount of  
> RAM, wikipedia mentions that some AMD chips even offer a 48 bit memory  
> bus). Note that bus width and register width do not have to have a  
> one-to-one relationship. The early 286 processor had a register width of  
> 16 bits but an address bus with 24 bits (4MB), so they had to invent  
> this segmentation model in order to compute a 20bit address from two 16  
> bit registers. Twenty years later, the segmenation unit is still present  
> at the Intel architecture while the numbers have been reversed: now the  
> 36 or 40 bit physical address is computed from a 16 bit value and a 64  
> bit value. Sounds like overkill, and yes, it is. That's just for  
> backwards compatibility for applications from 1985.
>
> Regards,
> Stuart

Thanks. I am not too sure now :-(

I have an old Intel Pentium 4 1500Mhz PC. Can it run 64-bit OS ?


-- 
Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "sl@exabyte" <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-14 21:58 +0800
  Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "sl@exabyte" <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-14 22:01 +0800
  Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-11-14 09:12 -0500
    Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-14 14:11 -0300
      Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-11-14 12:14 -0500
        Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-11-14 18:36 +0100
          Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "sl@exabyte" <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-15 10:48 +0800
            Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-11-16 00:08 +0100
              Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "SL@maxis" <ecp_gen@my-rialto.com> - 2012-11-16 09:23 +0800
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-15 22:52 -0600
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201211.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-11-16 16:44 +0100
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-11-17 13:18 +0100
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-17 12:42 -0600
              Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-15 22:46 -0600
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-11-16 12:08 +0100
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-16 18:08 -0600
                Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-11-17 23:59 +0100
              Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-11-16 12:42 +0000
            Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-11-16 05:17 -0800
    Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-11-14 20:08 +0100

csiph-web