Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19766
| From | Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? |
| References | <k83sma$3qm$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <3dea97c25f2492e75dcd428e705880d9@remailer.paranoici.org> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-11-16 12:42 +0000 |
| Organization | mail2news@dizum.com |
Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> wrote: > On 11/15/12 sl@exabyte wrote: > [snip] > > And I suppose only hardware with 64-bit address bus can run 64-bit OS. > > Wrong. Typical 64 bit processors have either a 36 bit or a 40 bit > physical address bus (40 bits are 1 TB, an almost incredible amount of > RAM, wikipedia mentions that some AMD chips even offer a 48 bit memory > bus). IBM offers a 64 bit data bus for a theoretical max storage 2^64 bytes. Unfortunately they only support 256T the heartless bastards! ;-)
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "sl@exabyte" <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-14 21:58 +0800
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "sl@exabyte" <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-14 22:01 +0800
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-11-14 09:12 -0500
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Cholo Lennon <chololennon@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-14 14:11 -0300
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-11-14 12:14 -0500
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-11-14 18:36 +0100
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "sl@exabyte" <sb5309@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-15 10:48 +0800
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-11-16 00:08 +0100
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? "SL@maxis" <ecp_gen@my-rialto.com> - 2012-11-16 09:23 +0800
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-15 22:52 -0600
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Fritz Wuehler <fritz@spamexpire-201211.rodent.frell.theremailer.net> - 2012-11-16 16:44 +0100
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2012-11-17 13:18 +0100
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-17 12:42 -0600
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-15 22:46 -0600
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-11-16 12:08 +0100
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2012-11-16 18:08 -0600
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Stuart <DerTopper@web.de> - 2012-11-17 23:59 +0100
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Anonymous <nobody@remailer.paranoici.org> - 2012-11-16 12:42 +0000
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-11-16 05:17 -0800
Re: Program in 32-bit, run on 64-bit OK? Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-11-14 20:08 +0100
csiph-web