Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21987
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: "heartbeat" approach |
| Date | 2013-02-01 15:20 -0800 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <ldjog85seq7bflvn6poekd4m14scjsg125@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <0e900395-a38a-44a1-a5bf-01cc781c8728@googlegroups.com> |
On Fri, 1 Feb 2013 08:11:14 -0800 (PST), bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >However, that means there could be multiple threads writing to one socket. Do I need to do anything special to have multiple threads writing to one socket? Is there a better way? I wrote some proprietary code for a large scale security camera monitoring system perhaps 5 years ago that did just that. IIRC sockets are happy to have multiple writers. The alternative would be to use a queue fed by multiple writers with a single reader. I don't recall writing any queue stuff until a year or so ago. TCP/IP is completely silent unless you are actively transmitting data, unlike many other protocols. So if you can to detect a broken link, you need some artificial traffic. That is why he needs a "heartbeat". -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com The first 90% of the code accounts for the first 90% of the development time. The remaining 10% of the code accounts for the other 90% of the development time. ~ Tom Cargill Ninety-ninety Law
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"heartbeat" approach bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-02-01 08:11 -0800
Re: "heartbeat" approach Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2013-02-01 08:40 -0800
Re: "heartbeat" approach Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-01 17:46 -0500
Re: "heartbeat" approach Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 00:13 +0100
Re: "heartbeat" approach Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-01 18:21 -0500
Re: "heartbeat" approach Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 06:51 -0400
Re: "heartbeat" approach Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-01 15:20 -0800
csiph-web