Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #21958
| From | Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: "heartbeat" approach |
| Date | 2013-02-01 08:40 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <kegr5i$i02$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <0e900395-a38a-44a1-a5bf-01cc781c8728@googlegroups.com> |
On 2/1/2013 8:11 AM, bob smith wrote: > What is the best way to handle a situation where you want a socket to > send a "heartbeat" every ten minutes? I was thinking it would be > simple to have a single thread do all the "heartbeat" sending. > > However, that means there could be multiple threads writing to one > socket. Do I need to do anything special to have multiple threads > writing to one socket? Is there a better way? > > Thanks. > Just synchronize on the Socket or the OutputStream. The cost of synchronizing in that case would be very low. -- Knute Johnson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
"heartbeat" approach bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2013-02-01 08:11 -0800
Re: "heartbeat" approach Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2013-02-01 08:40 -0800
Re: "heartbeat" approach Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-01 17:46 -0500
Re: "heartbeat" approach Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2013-02-02 00:13 +0100
Re: "heartbeat" approach Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2013-02-01 18:21 -0500
Re: "heartbeat" approach Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom2@eastlink.ca> - 2013-02-03 06:51 -0400
Re: "heartbeat" approach Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2013-02-01 15:20 -0800
csiph-web