Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #3104
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!Xl.tags.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local2.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.bt.com!news.bt.com.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 18 Apr 2011 07:03:11 -0500 |
| From | rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? |
| Date | Mon, 18 Apr 2011 13:01:47 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <ku9oq6h99ajn1f7o6cqg3fgnm2ocr5e1aq@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <d97822e4-ee7c-458d-8818-07007fb714e8@k3g2000prl.googlegroups.com> |
| X-Newsreader | Forte Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=us-ascii |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Lines | 10 |
| X-Usenet-Provider | http://www.giganews.com |
| X-AuthenticatedUsername | NoAuthUser |
| X-Trace | sv3-WLb4yE+NM3X+YILj4Azt9lPmcInemBqUnAsSqspN5szvVrYJW7weJrkFKdimQB0lXsvlotUkwisyKts!yk4YPig6rEKacy87mympTwnqs+/KO0fw8nYHW0XxjL75fCumCHd+4mlgAObxXIe1oI2YXosfAB3B!cxLE |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-DMCA-Complaints-To | abuse@btinternet.com |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers |
| X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info | Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly |
| X-Postfilter | 1.3.40 |
| X-Original-Bytes | 1439 |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:3104 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sun, 17 Apr 2011 19:51:20 -0700 (PDT), theglazeb <theglazeb@gmail.com> wrote: >And perhaps try to avoid the "death spiral" from occurring when two >players use the tit for tat strategy? Keep a count of the number of consecutive "Defect" plays. After some preset number automatically play a "Cooperate". rossum
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Basic prisoner's dilemma? theglazeb <theglazeb@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 19:51 -0700
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-17 23:15 -0400
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-04-18 13:54 +1000
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? theglazeb <theglazeb@gmail.com> - 2011-04-17 22:08 -0700
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2011-04-17 23:47 -0700
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-18 00:14 -0700
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-04-18 13:01 +0100
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Bent C Dalager <bcd@pvv.ntnu.no> - 2011-04-18 13:38 +0000
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-18 19:22 +0200
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-18 13:34 -0400
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-18 21:26 +0200
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-18 16:33 -0400
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-04-18 23:50 +0200
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-04-18 18:37 -0400
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? markspace <-@.> - 2011-04-18 15:51 -0700
Re: Basic prisoner's dilemma? Michael Wojcik <mwojcik@newsguy.com> - 2011-04-19 16:14 -0400
csiph-web