Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19326
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: 32 or 64 |
| Date | 2012-10-14 12:41 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <k5epj9$9ts$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <12urv0qp275z.1pmt1ggs392z9$.dlg@40tude.net> |
On 10/14/2012 11:58 AM, don wrote: > For purposes of Java development is it better to have both the 32 and 64 > bit versions of the SDK installed, or only one of them? > Some programs require the 32 bit and some come in a version for each, like > eclipse. When x64 Java first became available I began using it but found > that some programs, like Vuze, required the 32 bit version. > It seems odd that you would need 2 versions of the SDK and JVM installed on > a machine. I’d like to eliminate one of them but it seems that means the 32 > bit would be the one to use since it’s probably the most compatible. And > that seems like moving backwards. Are all of your questions following this? <http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/hotspotfaq-138619.html#64bit_description>
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 11:58 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-14 12:41 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 13:53 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-14 14:37 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 11:38 -0700
Re: 32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 15:10 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 21:31 -0700
Re: 32 or 64 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-14 22:43 -0700
csiph-web