Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19326

Re: 32 or 64

From Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: 32 or 64
Date 2012-10-14 12:41 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <k5epj9$9ts$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <12urv0qp275z.1pmt1ggs392z9$.dlg@40tude.net>

Show all headers | View raw


On 10/14/2012 11:58 AM, don wrote:
> For purposes of Java development is it better to have both the 32 and 64
> bit versions of the SDK installed, or only one of them?
> Some programs require the 32 bit and some come in a version for each, like
> eclipse. When x64 Java first became available I began using it but found
> that some programs, like Vuze, required the 32 bit version.
> It seems odd that you would need 2 versions of the SDK and JVM installed on
> a machine. I’d like to eliminate one of them but it seems that means the 32
> bit would be the one to use since it’s probably the most compatible. And
> that seems like moving backwards.
Are all of your questions following this?
<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/hotspotfaq-138619.html#64bit_description>

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 11:58 -0400
  Re: 32 or 64 Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-14 12:41 -0400
  Re: 32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 13:53 -0400
    Re: 32 or 64 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-14 14:37 -0400
    Re: 32 or 64 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 11:38 -0700
      Re: 32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 15:10 -0400
        Re: 32 or 64 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 21:31 -0700
  Re: 32 or 64 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-14 22:43 -0700

csiph-web