Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19330
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-14 11:38 -0700 |
| References | <12urv0qp275z.1pmt1ggs392z9$.dlg@40tude.net> <16abkzdwgzrit$.yvnvcktef8be.dlg@40tude.net> |
| Message-ID | <287984f1-5f74-43c5-a8e9-5be7f397cf0a@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: 32 or 64 |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
don wrote: > don wrote: >> For purposes of Java development is it better to have both the 32 and 64 >> bit versions of the SDK installed, or only one of them? Depends. I have both installed, but I have not used the 32-bit version on a 64-bit computer in years. >> Some programs require the 32 bit and some come in a version for each, like Which ones require the 32-bit version? No Java program, for sure. >> eclipse [sic]. When x64 Java first became available I began using it but found >> that some programs, like Vuze, required the 32 bit version. And yet they include a 64-bit JAR for the SWT part, which contains native code. Hmm. Could you be mistaken? There's nothing in the Vuze documentation that limits it to using 32-bit Java. >> It seems odd that you would need 2 versions of the SDK and JVM installed on Especially since you don't. >> a machine. I’d like to eliminate one of them but it seems that means the 32 >> bit would be the one to use since it’s probably the most compatible. And They're equally compatible. Java bytecode doesn't change for 64-bit vs. 32-bit. >> that seems like moving backwards. The operative word being "seems" since the premise is false. > One more thing occurred to me after my original post: Isn’t it desirable > that the transition from 32 to 64 bit Java should eventually replace and > obsolete the 32 bit version? No, since one doesn't render the other obsolete. > For instance, from the point of view of market acceptance, in light of all > the other obstacles that exist, does it really make sense to require users > to have installed two versions of the Java VM? No, but then no one does. What other obstacles? Java is arguably the most widely accepted programming language right now. Certainly it's up there. Facts not in evidence, premise of the question not valid, there is no meaningful answer. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 11:58 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-14 12:41 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 13:53 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-14 14:37 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 11:38 -0700
Re: 32 or 64 don <thedon@here.com> - 2012-10-14 15:10 -0400
Re: 32 or 64 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-14 21:31 -0700
Re: 32 or 64 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-14 22:43 -0700
csiph-web