Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19220
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | [OT] The addendum and Meta [was]Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) |
| Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2012 05:51:37 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 62 |
| Message-ID | <k53g4d$fks$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <6d2e79a9-7f37-4558-89b1-d451298b9890@googlegroups.com> <k51bm5$etp$1@dont-email.me> <fea256a3-09a6-49ff-918d-67fe2482a207@googlegroups.com> <k524mn$o1s$1@dont-email.me> <fe531b78-3e30-4221-a07b-96d3d7f9a16f@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:45:49 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6a6a291fa7e9c0bd872c1a9cbe2b371d"; logging-data="16028"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/1Zhb0+HCjNLaiAfvuWV22FegdzYsNpr4=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20120925 Icedove/3.0.11 |
| In-Reply-To | <fe531b78-3e30-4221-a07b-96d3d7f9a16f@googlegroups.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:cn8eM2fRAWsAfNOTJtAf1a3lCPQ= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:19220 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 10/09/2012 07:08 PM, Lew wrote: > Jeff Higgins wrote: >> It's curious that you reply to my reply to the original post >> and then leave my comments uncommented upon. It seems somewhat >> akin to top posting. I admit to having committed the same >> on occasion, but you do it with some regularity and I thought >> to comment on this occasion. Perhaps your newsreader makes it >> difficult to negotiate the hierarchy of the thread and you >> simply reply to the last post read. > > I insert my comments inline where I have further remarks, but I keep > yours where they were, as with other cited material, to establish context > and to endorse the content, as useful at least and, in your case, as correct. > > If I put my remarks under yours, then it looks as though I'm reacting to that > remark, when my point is usually marginal to an earlier line by a different > poster. > > If I remove your remarks, then I lose the context that I deem important to cite. > > I often find myself responding to threads where the main question has already > been answered better than I could have, but I see dangling threads. For example, > this is hypothetical, say I see an idiom for a 'final' instance method in a concurrent > context, and I see that 'final' might server better. I'll comment on that, and leave > your remarks in place in order not to lose the real answer. Ah, OK an unannounced inline addendum. Thanks for the explanation. While replying to the original post I briefly considered tracking down and including links to the relevant parts of the JLS but thought that would muddy my attempt at a simple lay explanation. You gasp and sputter, I heard you. Anyway you whip out the BNF in all its glorious Truth and Beauty, and it is Majestic. I thank you. No joke. I'm sure the newb is feelin' it too. > > And I'm using a web interface to Usenet which is a pain in the ass. It breaks lines > arbitrarily and doubles the lines, so a quoted line is > >> this is a broken >> >> line through the >> >> f- friendly interface. > > I have to demangle a lot to post. It's a testament to how important I think my > comments are that I am willing to go through all this effort to share them. > > You're welcome. > > (That was a joke, BTW.) > > For various reasons unrelated to product quality it's inconvenient to use > Thunderbird lately. I find the discussions here very enlightening so I soldier on. > Yep, it's sad. I recall Andrew Thompson experiencing a similar predicament (forced use of a WITUN) shortly before he pissed off of c.l.j.p to focus his attention on the greater volume an perhaps more stimulating Q/A type discussion at the (then) Sun Java Forums.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) waiter.james1991@gmail.com - 2012-10-09 01:48 -0700
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-09 02:03 -0700
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-09 10:23 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 10:15 -0700
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-09 17:30 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 16:08 -0700
[OT] The addendum and Meta [was]Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-10 05:51 -0400
An addendum Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-10 06:04 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-09 17:40 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-09 23:47 +0200
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-10-09 18:09 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-10 00:43 +0200
csiph-web