Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #19214
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-10-09 16:08 -0700 |
| References | <6d2e79a9-7f37-4558-89b1-d451298b9890@googlegroups.com> <k51bm5$etp$1@dont-email.me> <fea256a3-09a6-49ff-918d-67fe2482a207@googlegroups.com> <k524mn$o1s$1@dont-email.me> |
| Message-ID | <fe531b78-3e30-4221-a07b-96d3d7f9a16f@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) |
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
Jeff Higgins wrote: > It's curious that you reply to my reply to the original post > and then leave my comments uncommented upon. It seems somewhat > akin to top posting. I admit to having committed the same > on occasion, but you do it with some regularity and I thought > to comment on this occasion. Perhaps your newsreader makes it > difficult to negotiate the hierarchy of the thread and you > simply reply to the last post read. I insert my comments inline where I have further remarks, but I keep yours where they were, as with other cited material, to establish context and to endorse the content, as useful at least and, in your case, as correct. If I put my remarks under yours, then it looks as though I'm reacting to that remark, when my point is usually marginal to an earlier line by a different poster. If I remove your remarks, then I lose the context that I deem important to cite. I often find myself responding to threads where the main question has already been answered better than I could have, but I see dangling threads. For example, this is hypothetical, say I see an idiom for a 'final' instance method in a concurrent context, and I see that 'final' might server better. I'll comment on that, and leave your remarks in place in order not to lose the real answer. And I'm using a web interface to Usenet which is a pain in the ass. It breaks lines arbitrarily and doubles the lines, so a quoted line is > this is a broken > > line through the > > f- friendly interface. I have to demangle a lot to post. It's a testament to how important I think my comments are that I am willing to go through all this effort to share them. You're welcome. (That was a joke, BTW.) For various reasons unrelated to product quality it's inconvenient to use Thunderbird lately. I find the discussions here very enlightening so I soldier on. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) waiter.james1991@gmail.com - 2012-10-09 01:48 -0700
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-10-09 02:03 -0700
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-09 10:23 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 10:15 -0700
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-09 17:30 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-10-09 16:08 -0700
[OT] The addendum and Meta [was]Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-10 05:51 -0400
An addendum Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-10-10 06:04 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-09 17:40 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-09 23:47 +0200
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-10-09 18:09 -0400
Re: public <E> String FUNCTIONNAME( ?,?) Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-10-10 00:43 +0200
csiph-web