Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18377
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: thread vs fork? |
| Date | Tue, 28 Aug 2012 20:01:44 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <k1jpm0$clq$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <15cf029d-e8bc-47de-8b83-44e70247d381@googlegroups.com> <euto38td1cm90mg7qg11b2375oh925hj7q@4ax.com> <dca1d3b6-47f2-4145-8797-b2b720af1bcb@googlegroups.com> <k1jmh9$t9k$1@dont-email.me> <0c7750b2-3c6c-416e-8cfe-2673aee3259b@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Wed, 29 Aug 2012 01:01:52 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="5a9707252ba5efb9bece56d1f4656a90"; logging-data="12986"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2hWU7AsqlblqeD0QM3nwoyO7v/kYTAZQ=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120824 Thunderbird/15.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <0c7750b2-3c6c-416e-8cfe-2673aee3259b@googlegroups.com> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:zNFz6wjm940KFYzbhpeMuweBGJE= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:18377 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 8/28/2012 7:48 PM, Lew wrote: > Joshua Cranmer wrote: >> When I first saw the OP's question, I first thought he was referring to >> fork in the process-creation sense, so it's not clear to me offhand if >> he is referring to the process-creation fork or Java-framework fork. > > The OP explicitly said, "in java [sic]". That clears up that question completely. Not necessarily. If he meant the Java framework, I would have expected him to refer to it as "fork-join" instead of as just plain "fork". People do ask questions in this newsgroup all the time without naming things reliably. :-) -- Beware of bugs in the above code; I have only proved it correct, not tried it. -- Donald E. Knuth
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
thread vs fork? Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 23:40 -0700
Re: thread vs fork? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-26 03:27 -0400
Re: thread vs fork? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-26 09:34 -0400
Re: thread vs fork? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-28 00:52 -0700
Re: thread vs fork? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 13:54 -0700
Re: thread vs fork? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-08-28 19:08 -0500
Re: thread vs fork? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 17:48 -0700
Re: thread vs fork? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-08-28 20:01 -0500
Re: thread vs fork? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-29 11:01 -0700
csiph-web