Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18400

Re: thread vs fork?

Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Date	2012-08-29 11:01 -0700
References	(1 earlier) <euto38td1cm90mg7qg11b2375oh925hj7q@4ax.com> <dca1d3b6-47f2-4145-8797-b2b720af1bcb@googlegroups.com> <k1jmh9$t9k$1@dont-email.me> <0c7750b2-3c6c-416e-8cfe-2673aee3259b@googlegroups.com> <k1jpm0$clq$1@dont-email.me>
Message-ID	<f105933e-b807-4b21-ae0f-9502d44fe717@googlegroups.com> (permalink)
Subject	Re: thread vs fork?
From	Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Joshua Cranmer wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> The OP explicitly said, "in java [sic]". That clears up that question completely.
> 
> Not necessarily. If he meant the Java framework, I would have expected 
> him to refer to it as "fork-join" instead of as just plain "fork". 
> People do ask questions in this newsgroup all the time without naming 
> things reliably. :-)

You raise a good point.

I suppose I put too much faith in the wording.

-- 
Lew

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

thread vs fork? Peter Cheung <cmk128@gmail.com> - 2012-08-25 23:40 -0700
  Re: thread vs fork? "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-08-26 03:27 -0400
  Re: thread vs fork? Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-08-26 09:34 -0400
  Re: thread vs fork? Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-08-28 00:52 -0700
    Re: thread vs fork? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 13:54 -0700
      Re: thread vs fork? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-08-28 19:08 -0500
        Re: thread vs fork? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-28 17:48 -0700
          Re: thread vs fork? Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2012-08-28 20:01 -0500
            Re: thread vs fork? Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-08-29 11:01 -0700

csiph-web