Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #16271
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: @Override |
| Date | 2012-07-24 00:08 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <juki1b$vqh$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <75036e8b-8b5f-4ea4-aef7-c063249f5707@googlegroups.com> <jukcik$t0m$1@dont-email.me> <9da89e66-d7df-47e1-84d4-2dddea7d744f@googlegroups.com> <jukgd7$k7n$1@dont-email.me> <3efdf82b-e94f-4608-82a7-0132b52b8977@googlegroups.com> |
On 23/07/2012 23:51, Lew allegedly wrote: > On Monday, July 23, 2012 2:40:21 PM UTC-7, Daniele Futtorovic wrote: >> Uh... there was a (pretty long) time when people and programs *did* >> manage to exist without that annotation, you know. No need to be overly >> dramatic. > > You sound like Grandpaw complaining that kids these days have it too easy. > "In my day, we had to check for ourselves whether the method overrode a > parent method!" > > Your irrelevant observation does not give a reason to eschew '@Override'. > > The fact is that Java *does* have it, and it *is* useful for the class of bugs > it helps prevent. > > A point you ignore in your rush to fallacious argumentation. > > That languages (including Java itself) didn't used to have > it is hardly an argument against it. In fact, that Java added it, given the > language's resistance to change, is strong evidence in favor of it. > So your evidence supports use of '@Override'. You drew exactly the > opposite of the correct conclusion from your data. And you sound like a drama queen. The fact that Java programs existed at a point where @Override didn't exist proves that this annotation is not strictly necessary. And the assiduous JLS reader that you are should know that this hasn't changed. Is that annotation a good thing? Yes. Should it be used? Absolutely. As a matter of fact, its merits are such that with a minimum of explanation, any sensible person would adopt it on their own. No need to exaggerate or dramatize the issue. No need to try to ridicule me for refusing your dramatization. Attempts like that to use coercion rather than reason are counter-productive. -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
@Override bob smith <bob@coolfone.comze.com> - 2012-07-23 11:30 -0700
Re: @Override Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-23 20:52 +0200
Re: @Override markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-23 11:54 -0700
Re: @Override Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 13:05 -0700
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-23 19:54 -0400
Re: @Override "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2012-07-23 15:56 -0400
Re: @Override Peter Duniho <NpOeStPeAdM@NnOwSlPiAnMk.com> - 2012-07-23 14:19 -0700
Re: @Override rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2012-07-24 13:09 +0100
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-24 21:29 -0400
Re: @Override Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-24 09:04 -0400
Re: @Override Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-23 16:35 -0400
Re: @Override Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 13:59 -0700
Re: @Override Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-23 23:40 +0200
Re: @Override Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 14:51 -0700
Re: @Override Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-24 00:08 +0200
Re: @Override Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-23 16:57 -0700
Re: @Override Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-24 09:46 +0200
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-23 19:58 -0400
Re: @Override Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-23 22:16 -0400
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-23 22:57 -0400
Re: @Override Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2012-07-23 23:47 -0400
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-24 21:35 -0400
Re: @Override Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2012-07-26 20:00 -0600
Re: @Override Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-23 14:01 -0700
Re: @Override Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-07-24 00:22 +0200
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-23 19:53 -0400
Re: @Override Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-23 18:59 -0700
Re: @Override Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-07-24 22:57 +0200
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-24 21:24 -0400
Re: @Override Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-24 15:36 +0200
Re: @Override Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-24 09:54 -0700
Re: @Override Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-07-24 23:14 +0200
Re: @Override Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-25 07:57 +0200
Re: @Override Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-25 10:34 -0700
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-25 14:54 -0400
Re: @Override Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-30 14:42 +0200
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-24 21:20 -0400
Re: @Override Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-07-25 06:26 -0700
Re: @Override Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-25 17:16 -0400
Re: @Override Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-23 20:59 -0700
Re: @Override Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2012-07-24 16:06 +0200
csiph-web