Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15957
| From | Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 |
| Date | 2012-07-12 00:51 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jtl02t$3d5$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <de29d6dc-c1e0-43ae-af74-0f0675a744f1@googlegroups.com> <539uc9-7jg.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <e4256c67-0761-40fc-ac35-115c2cddae44@googlegroups.com> <s0buc9-tvg.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> <bpurv7djej2mp14l52ob48etckqqs2ksec@4ax.com> |
On 12/07/2012 00:19, Roedy Green allegedly wrote: > On Tue, 10 Jul 2012 21:05:33 +0200, Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> wrote, > quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >> Forward compatible does not exist, > > The words forward and backward don't add anything but confusion. Some > people say backward and some forward. > > In theory you might have a kind of compatability where you could > compile a 1.6 program on a 1.6 compiler and run it on a 1.2 run time > if you did not use any of the new features. It does NOT work that > way. /Code/ is (at best) forward-compatible. /Compilers/ or /runtimes/ are (at best) backward-compatible. -- DF.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Sanny <softtanks22@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-10 10:07 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 11:26 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-07-10 20:32 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-07-10 21:05 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 12:56 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-11 15:19 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 15:50 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-11 16:41 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 17:03 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-12 00:51 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-11 23:13 -0400
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Sanny <softtanks22@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-11 00:27 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-07-11 13:12 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 14:02 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-12 00:06 +0200
OT Google Groups formatting. Was Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-11 15:16 -0700
Re: OT Google Groups formatting. Was Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-12 11:00 +0200
Re: OT Google Groups formatting. Was Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-12 00:54 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 16:25 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-11 15:15 -0700
csiph-web