Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #15922
| From | Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 |
| Date | 2012-07-10 11:56 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <e4256c67-0761-40fc-ac35-115c2cddae44@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| References | <725fbc58-fab7-4e70-9f1a-b2e393fdeca9@googlegroups.com> <de29d6dc-c1e0-43ae-af74-0f0675a744f1@googlegroups.com> <539uc9-7jg.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan> |
On Tuesday, July 10, 2012 11:32:39 AM UTC-7, Luuk wrote: > On 10-07-2012 20:26, Lew wrote: > > Sanny wrote: > >> Well I had a program/ Applet in Java 1.2 I want to migrate the code to Java 1.6 > > > > It should be forward compatible. > > > > I think the proper way to say this is: > The newer version is backwards compatible Which is more correct - the car is moving faster than the pedestrian, or the pedestrian is moving slower than the car? Since the OP asked about his Applet, the antecedent for "it" was the program, which would be *forward* compatible with Java 6. If we had been talking about Java 6, the proper way to say that would have been *backward* compatible, not backward*s* compatible. To correct someone, you must yourself be correct. -- Lew
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Sanny <softtanks22@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-10 10:07 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 11:26 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-07-10 20:32 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 11:56 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2012-07-10 21:05 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-10 12:56 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-11 15:19 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 15:50 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-07-11 16:41 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 17:03 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-12 00:51 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-07-11 23:13 -0400
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Sanny <softtanks22@hotmail.com> - 2012-07-11 00:27 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Silvio Bierman <silvio@moc.com> - 2012-07-11 13:12 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 14:02 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-12 00:06 +0200
OT Google Groups formatting. Was Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-11 15:16 -0700
Re: OT Google Groups formatting. Was Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lars Enderin <lars.enderin@telia.com> - 2012-07-12 11:00 +0200
Re: OT Google Groups formatting. Was Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 markspace <-@.> - 2012-07-12 10:36 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2012-07-12 00:54 +0200
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-07-11 16:25 -0700
Re: Updating code from jdk1.2 to recent jdk SE 1.6 Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-07-11 15:15 -0700
csiph-web