Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #14494

Re: Good Fowler article on ORM

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Good Fowler article on ORM
Date Sat, 12 May 2012 21:59:34 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Lines 19
Message-ID <jomff6$f1k$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <kDXqr.1107$FL3.615@newsfe11.iad> <vokoq7t9vj5cf68rk9ricd63meejh8r3rk@4ax.com> <joihae$oiv$1@news.albasani.net> <jokg12$jce$1@dont-email.me> <jolcd0$3g7$1@news.albasani.net> <joldlk$gv7$1@dont-email.me> <jolgn9$chj$1@news.albasani.net> <jomcmv$9l6$1@news.albasani.net> <jomf41$ef9$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace news.albasani.net n8dF6yMfy5Wf82FPFIPRQ/HcbR5W93uOQj8ZBC88IhSZGtEE4dthC+nVMwTwpRP1d4HuMTGpQtVOY1GJAlh74h0PT289YbOO9dsKNnFV8O9F04WIJIM03yi6Gzb1lo9U
NNTP-Posting-Date Sat, 12 May 2012 19:59:34 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info news.albasani.net; logging-data="6klyz05F1g3iFc/vDLfWzTln5Osko96uZdZnHm1LP4wyCr2BRtX+Pq2dSAWfDBM/b+xAyEcD2DGW+bQigSeLOf0qT1O+/iL2UHI3gaG/JhgGGd6lzOGD0xgS840SIBBE"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120429 Firefox/12.0 SeaMonkey/2.9.1
In-Reply-To <jomf41$ef9$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock sha1:8FKj4bt4zkAEuIHzxvI1wEaDj+M=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:14494

Show key headers only | View raw

Jan Burse schrieb:
> Without a JIT, direct field access is about 3x faster than invoking a
> trivial getter. With the JIT (where direct field access is as cheap as
> accessing a local), direct field access is about 7x faster than invoking
> a trivial getter. This is true in Froyo, but will improve in the future
> when the JIT inlines getter methods."

Maybe an updated happened, but I didn't find a notice
about it. The last notice I found was:

http://android-developers.blogspot.com/2010/05/dalvik-jit.html
Which is already 2 years old!

The above blog post refers to Android 2.2,
which is Froyo.

Maybe somehow has found something newer?

Bye

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Good Fowler article on ORM Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-05-10 19:50 -0300
  Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2012-05-10 16:52 -0700
    Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-10 20:10 -0400
    Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Leif Roar Moldskred <leifm@dimnakorr.com> - 2012-05-11 01:56 -0500
    Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-11 10:06 +0200
      Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-11 10:09 +0200
      Re: Good Fowler article on ORM David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-05-11 21:56 -0400
        Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 12:01 +0200
          Re: Good Fowler article on ORM David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-05-12 06:22 -0400
            Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 13:14 +0200
              Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 13:27 +0200
              Re: Good Fowler article on ORM markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-12 08:15 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 18:21 +0200
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-12 10:37 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-12 12:27 -0700
                Re: Dalvik running on the Android device emulator Fredrik Jonson <fredrik@jonson.org> - 2012-05-13 07:21 +0000
                Re: Dalvik running on the Android device emulator David Lamb <dalamb@cs.queensu.ca> - 2012-05-13 08:18 -0400
              Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-12 12:12 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 21:53 +0200
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 21:59 +0200
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-12 13:55 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-12 13:59 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-12 23:49 +0200
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-12 17:14 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM jb <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2012-05-13 02:11 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-05-14 22:25 -0700
                Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-20 22:15 -0400
  Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-10 20:03 -0400
    Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-05-10 18:40 -0700
      Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-05-10 21:42 -0400
    Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-05-13 19:40 -0300
  Re: Good Fowler article on ORM markspace <-@.> - 2012-05-10 19:17 -0700
  Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-05-10 16:41 -0700
    Re: Good Fowler article on ORM Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-05-12 14:33 -0700

csiph-web