Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12766
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Question about loggers |
| Date | 2012-03-08 07:22 -0800 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <jjair3$63e$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <XnsA00FACCA4B5E9jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <4f57de3b$0$286$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <XnsA00FC1E7AC0A8jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <4f57fc25$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> |
Arne Vajhøj wrote: > I would use a static logger and not call getLogger in every ctor. > > Not due to performance, because I don't think there will be much, > but because I think it is nice to keep that type of non business > logic out of the ctor, so that when one read the ctor one can focus > on the real purpose of it. I prefer instance loggers, as a rule but not always. For one thing this allows me to determine the logger's identity via a call to 'getClass()'. Mainly, though, it's the scope of the variable. In an instance context I prefer instance or local variables. In a static context I prefer local variables, occasionally static memebers. I determine the scope of the logger variable by the scope of its use. Logging is a standard enough aspect that I don't find it offputting in the logic. -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Question about loggers Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-07 21:52 +0000
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-07 17:16 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-07 23:57 +0000
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-07 19:24 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-03-08 07:22 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-08 10:27 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 11:58 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-08 15:49 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-08 08:15 -0800
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-08 10:05 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-08 13:50 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-09 07:11 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-03-09 07:45 -0800
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-09 07:54 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 11:03 -0500
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-09 09:10 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 12:27 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-09 10:56 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-09 20:29 +0100
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-09 09:14 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 12:22 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-09 10:58 -0800
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-07 15:21 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-08 00:01 +0000
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-07 19:21 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-03-08 06:18 -0400
csiph-web