Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #12778
| Date | 2012-03-08 15:49 -0500 |
|---|---|
| From | Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Question about loggers |
| References | (2 earlier) <XnsA00FC1E7AC0A8jpnasty@94.75.214.39> <4f57fc25$0$290$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <jjair3$63e$1@news.albasani.net> <4f58cfff$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> <2754540.855.1331236712570.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@pbcql4> |
| Message-ID | <4f591b4b$0$285$14726298@news.sunsite.dk> (permalink) |
| Organization | SunSITE.dk - Supporting Open source |
On 3/8/2012 2:58 PM, Lew wrote:
> Arne Vajhøj wrote:
>> For instance I would still prefer to have getLogger assignment in the
>> definition and not down in the ctor.
>
> If you mean something like
>
> public class Foo
> {
> private final Logger logger = getLogger(getClass().getName());
> // ...
> }
Yes.
> until now I thought you were including that when you said "in the ctor".
>
> Now I understand you to mean "explicitly within the declared body of a constructor" as opposed to logically in the constructor.
Sorry for the confusion.
Arne
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Question about loggers Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-07 21:52 +0000
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-07 17:16 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-07 23:57 +0000
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-07 19:24 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-03-08 07:22 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-08 10:27 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-08 11:58 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-08 15:49 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-08 08:15 -0800
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-08 10:05 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-08 13:50 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-09 07:11 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-03-09 07:45 -0800
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-09 07:54 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 11:03 -0500
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-09 09:10 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 12:27 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-09 10:56 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2012-03-09 20:29 +0100
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 11:04 -0500
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-09 09:14 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-09 12:22 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2012-03-09 10:58 -0800
Re: Question about loggers markspace <-@.> - 2012-03-07 15:21 -0800
Re: Question about loggers Novice <novice@example..com> - 2012-03-08 00:01 +0000
Re: Question about loggers Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-03-07 19:21 -0500
Re: Question about loggers Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2012-03-08 06:18 -0400
csiph-web