Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11730
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication |
| Date | Fri, 03 Feb 2012 18:46:09 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 26 |
| Message-ID | <jghrk7$gur$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <IPC-20120203200443@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Injection-Date | Fri, 3 Feb 2012 23:46:16 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | mx04.eternal-september.org; posting-host="BSKXKq4dV+7jFlM4JDctyw"; logging-data="17371"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+avLZoz+ZlvyncN312kUBe6vWUsGPKYxI=" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20111110 Icedove/3.0.11 |
| In-Reply-To | <IPC-20120203200443@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Iqvqsx541tjwyQNn0WAkyQNJNQA= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11730 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 02/03/2012 02:52 PM, Stefan Ram wrote: > »X« below is another language than Java, for example, > VBA, C#, or C. > > When an X process and a Java process have to exchange > information on the same computer, what possibilites are > there? The Java process should act as a client, sending > commands to the X process and also wants to read answers > from the X process. So, the X process is a kind of server. > > My criteria are: reliability and it should not be extremely > slow (say exchanging a string should not take more than > about 10 ms). The main criterion is reliability. > > »Reliability« means little risk of creating problems, little > risk of failure at run-time. (It might help when the client > [=Java process] can reset the communication to a known and > sane start state in case of problems detected at run-time.) > > The host OS is Windows, but a portable solution won't hurt. > For Windows platform: <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365574%28v=vs.85%29.aspx> Prune for Java/X support, prune again for your choice of protocol. snip
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-03 18:46 -0500
csiph-web