Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11730 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-02-03 18:46 -0500 |
| Last post | 2012-02-03 18:46 -0500 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.java.programmer
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-02-03 18:46 -0500
| From | Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-02-03 18:46 -0500 |
| Subject | Re: Interplatform (interprocess, interlanguage) communication |
| Message-ID | <jghrk7$gur$1@dont-email.me> |
On 02/03/2012 02:52 PM, Stefan Ram wrote: > »X« below is another language than Java, for example, > VBA, C#, or C. > > When an X process and a Java process have to exchange > information on the same computer, what possibilites are > there? The Java process should act as a client, sending > commands to the X process and also wants to read answers > from the X process. So, the X process is a kind of server. > > My criteria are: reliability and it should not be extremely > slow (say exchanging a string should not take more than > about 10 ms). The main criterion is reliability. > > »Reliability« means little risk of creating problems, little > risk of failure at run-time. (It might help when the client > [=Java process] can reset the communication to a known and > sane start state in case of problems detected at run-time.) > > The host OS is Windows, but a portable solution won't hurt. > For Windows platform: <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/windows/desktop/aa365574%28v=vs.85%29.aspx> Prune for Java/X support, prune again for your choice of protocol. snip
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.java.programmer
csiph-web