Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #11354

Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Lew <noone@lewscanon.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable
Date	Sun, 15 Jan 2012 10:18:04 -0800
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	17
Message-ID	<jev58s$bum$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<a3ed0747-5eb5-4da1-9f7f-c6ebdc8cbafd@v13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> <Xns9FD87F16AD841vaj4088ianshef@138.125.254.103> <jeoec5$q62$1@news.albasani.net> <4f1254c3$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net uSaF+T1ECjbcb5DX/RtfuG93nftkPoAsZNXDOZUMzXzhSuM9aREQADfJsofZ4n7B2YruPlNL7a3SU0JWQ0QOcIokXEZ26VifM70zQ1XrcuHcGGFlSRP5VAlwADm7E++E
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sun, 15 Jan 2012 18:18:04 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="upznQBqnnDN+rq4IXcwx8bkBnhTA3U0wqNoEuo3ZXXcwsq9ZTiLolpUAffMoQvr6KysSpEkTdL1J0TIlVjm19xX70esBpSb4C90lib7zM+v+QUodGQBl8uMDMoqpq1Da"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.24) Gecko/20111109 Thunderbird/3.1.16
In-Reply-To	<4f1254c3$0$283$14726298@news.sunsite.dk>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:UnTYMvAbt0nQ6qbYOyp9l5bfjI4=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:11354

Show key headers only | View raw

Arne Vajhøj wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> Ian Shef wrote:
>>> List is NOT Serializable,
>>
>> Isn't this something determined at runtime?
>
> For serialization: yes.
>
> For findbugs utility: no.

Hence the facepalm.

-- 
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable "laredotornado@zipmail.com" <laredotornado@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 08:40 -0800
  Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2012-01-12 12:04 -0500
    Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable "laredotornado@zipmail.com" <laredotornado@gmail.com> - 2012-01-12 09:48 -0800
      Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-12 09:52 -0800
  Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2012-01-12 09:52 -0800
  Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2012-01-12 19:29 +0000
    Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-12 21:10 -0800
      Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-12 21:11 -0800
      Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2012-01-14 23:23 -0500
        Re: FindBugs complaining about non-serializable field although everything looks Serializable Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2012-01-15 10:18 -0800

csiph-web