Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #10389
| From | Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: for :each style question |
| Date | 2011-11-30 16:49 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <jb6iv8$8j1$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <30fdd7tlkkejm29ufduhc9nnfk7uu3c6h0@4ax.com> |
On 11/30/2011 3:32 PM, Roedy Green wrote:
> In a for:each loop, sometimes you want to treat the first and or last
> element specially.
>
> The obvious way to handle is to revert to a for int i= loop and check
> for special values of i.
>
> You can keep the for:each style if you have a boolean first= true that
> you set false to detect the first.
>
> I don't know of an equivalent way to detect the last.
>
> In the olden days I would have handled the first and last cases
> outside the loop, with the loop running over the middle elements. You
> can't do that with for:each.
>
> What do you consider the best style to deal with this?
public class test {
public static void main(String[] args) {
int ns[] = new int[23];
int last = 0;
for (int i=0; i<ns.length; i++)
ns[i] = i;
for (int n : ns) {
last = n;
}
System.out.println(last);
}
}
It's not elegant but it works.
--
Knute Johnson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
for :each style question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-11-30 15:32 -0800
Re: for :each style question Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-11-30 19:28 -0500
Re: for :each style question Chris Riesbeck <Chris.Riesbeck@gmail.com> - 2011-12-05 14:28 -0600
Re: for :each style question Knute Johnson <nospam@knutejohnson.com> - 2011-11-30 16:49 -0800
Re: for :each style question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-11-30 18:23 -0800
Re: for :each style question Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-10 13:28 +0100
Re: for :each style question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-12 12:07 -0800
Re: for :each style question Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2011-12-13 08:08 -0800
Re: for :each style question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-13 12:07 -0800
Re: for :each style question Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-17 16:20 +0100
Re: for :each style question Jim Janney <jjanney@shell.xmission.com> - 2011-12-14 14:31 -0700
Re: for :each style question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-12-14 16:53 -0800
Re: for :each style question Daniel Pitts <newsgroup.nospam@virtualinfinity.net> - 2011-12-15 16:16 -0800
Re: for :each style question Wanja Gayk <brixomatic@yahoo.com> - 2011-12-17 12:31 +0100
Re: for :each style question Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-11-30 21:35 -0500
Re: for :each style question Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2011-11-30 19:12 -0800
Re: for :each style question Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com> - 2011-12-01 23:36 +0100
Re: for :each style question Steven Simpson <ss@domain.invalid> - 2011-12-04 19:43 +0000
csiph-web