Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6838

Re: higher precision doubles

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: higher precision doubles
Date	Sat, 06 Aug 2011 16:12:51 -0700
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	37
Message-ID	<j1ki2h$uc7$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<j1hqc1$1ch$1@news.albasani.net> <cOqdnfXfM99lhaDTnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink.com> <j1j71t$vlg$1@news.albasani.net> <j1k4e5$1nt$1@news.albasani.net> <j1kbp7$i4v$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net 5KJjOt9otwBzg9GeYE2VMSGu1TE/cyGWHykvgTJ/RAAfM+2nCZXxZyJYB5owoAHEaHpzf+a10vhUTZphSq4A3g==
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 6 Aug 2011 23:17:38 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="ABaxItZbeVwMexoiSQFQ1KKYxfJAvEyz0Mh0dSoMFY6A7WEoeaiqTN3zrgLrHLs6QKeobY9Cr0AE50Oo7at3oOwdxCAmQCikftUeYZE9fwsdivTORQPGUHb2CIcrI4tE"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To	<j1kbp7$i4v$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:rTyTxkIreDUyJ6OtzMkOZfshUZw=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6838

Show key headers only | View raw

On 8/6/2011 2:30 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
> BGB schrieb:
>> also possible is, of course, to use BigDecimal or similar (as others
>> have noted), or implement ones' own higher-precision floating point
>
> BigDecimal Ops with MathContext would probably do, although I
> have never tried it. But would need to do my own DECIMAL80,
> since there is only DECIMAL64 and DECIMAL128. And would not
> cover any exponent restriction, only mantissa restriction.
>
> But wait, would BigDecimal really do? I am asking here for
> pi and sin. But when I look at BigDecimal I only see some
> basic arithmetic and some number theory.
>
> So where is the trigonomy package for BigDecimal?
>

I am not aware of any (but, Java is not my main language FWIW), but it 
is possible for one to write these themselves.

for example, see here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_series
and:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trigonometric_function

I had actually done this when implementing some of my own math functions 
(mostly in the case of implementing quaternions and also a float128 
type), however, this was in C.


> Bye
>
> http://download.oracle.com/javase/1,5.0/docs/api/java/math/BigDecimal.html
> http://download.oracle.com/javase/1,5.0/docs/api/java/math/MathContext.html
>
>

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 00:20 +0200
  Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 03:35 -0700
    Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 13:03 +0200
      Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 12:20 -0700
        Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 23:30 +0200
          Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 16:12 -0700
            Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:35 +0200
              Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 19:26 -0700
    Re: higher precision doubles supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-09 00:42 -0400
      Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-09 04:07 -0700
        Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-09 14:00 +0200
          Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-09 09:07 -0700
            Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-10 08:50 +0200
        Re: higher precision doubles supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-10 20:16 -0400
      Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-09 10:11 -0500
        Re: higher precision doubles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-09 22:40 -0400
          Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:06 -0500
            Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-10 08:53 -0700
  Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 21:24 +0200
    Re: higher precision doubles markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-06 13:29 -0700
      Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 23:20 +0200
        Re: higher precision doubles markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-06 15:43 -0700
          Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:06 +0200
            Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 16:21 -0700
              Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:34 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 21:32 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 17:24 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 17:39 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-07 09:26 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 21:23 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-07 20:48 -0400
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 09:05 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-08 05:37 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 19:08 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 19:16 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 19:29 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-08 21:34 -0500
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-08 13:49 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-09 01:08 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-09 02:44 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-09 12:52 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-09 13:15 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-07 13:51 -0700
              Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:59 +0200
        Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-08 21:03 -0500
    Re: higher precision doubles Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-06 17:33 -0400
    Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 14:51 -0700
      Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 00:57 +0200

csiph-web