Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #6829

Re: higher precision doubles

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: higher precision doubles
Date	Sat, 06 Aug 2011 12:20:09 -0700
Organization	albasani.net
Lines	42
Message-ID	<j1k4e5$1nt$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References	<j1hqc1$1ch$1@news.albasani.net> <cOqdnfXfM99lhaDTnZ2dnUVZ_vednZ2d@earthlink.com> <j1j71t$vlg$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Trace	news.albasani.net CBAvVT1poDRG0wYKz26QZObuf3EeIZIB5ZidKONgUsTYddFwEWj1U4yohpHN7RS19M448S/i/NjjE/HafVGFAA==
NNTP-Posting-Date	Sat, 6 Aug 2011 19:24:54 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info	news.albasani.net; logging-data="a1vnvgBVnyMsj19oZzN5JZzq0R+WpSw/G8JJmgHxWiC4fgGSGI51zgaMS9XmFY9fyhx/lInhLwGdkMugmQgYX2SU1z6r9uioV0akpWH6MGI8xgthlS9kaClEyRD1CUiE"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net"
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
In-Reply-To	<j1j71t$vlg$1@news.albasani.net>
Cancel-Lock	sha1:LEc6Ayc6levwU90F08jAgOCQLTc=
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:6829

Show key headers only | View raw

On 8/6/2011 4:03 AM, Jan Burse wrote:
> Patricia Shanahan schrieb:
>> to do so. Even without strictfp, the mantissa sizes and therefore the
>> precision are fixed.
>>
> I was thinking about double extended, where the precision does
> not stay fixed but is increased.
>
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_754#Zahlenformate_und_andere_Festlegungen_des_IEEE-754-Standards
>
>
> Double extended has in minimum 79 bit whereby 63 bit are mantissa
> and 15 bit are exponent.
>
> I was wondering whether I can take advantage of an AMD64. Since
> it has 80bit IEEE floating point registers:
>
> http://people.freebsd.org/~lstewart/references/amd64.pdf
> Paragraph 1.2

note: all major x86 chips have 80 bit FPU registers (this is not new).

however, no, one can't directly use them from Java AFAIK, but would 
instead likely need to use JNI calls into C land or similar, even then, 
it would depend some on the C compiler (many C compilers use an 80-bit 
"long double" type, whereas MSVC treats "long double" as an alias for 
"double").

also possible is, of course, to use BigDecimal or similar (as others 
have noted), or implement ones' own higher-precision floating point 
numbers in-software (say, implementing 128 bit or more floating-point 
numbers).

or implement a float256 format, with a 31-bit exponent and 224 bit mantissa.

yes, granted, implementing larger floating-point values is kind of a 
pain, and performance would be worse than with any natively-supported 
formats.

or such...

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 00:20 +0200
  Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 03:35 -0700
    Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 13:03 +0200
      Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 12:20 -0700
        Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 23:30 +0200
          Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 16:12 -0700
            Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:35 +0200
              Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-06 19:26 -0700
    Re: higher precision doubles supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-09 00:42 -0400
      Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-09 04:07 -0700
        Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-09 14:00 +0200
          Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-09 09:07 -0700
            Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-10 08:50 +0200
        Re: higher precision doubles supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations <supercalifragilisticexpialadiamaticonormalizeringelimatisticantations@averylongandannoyingdomainname.com> - 2011-08-10 20:16 -0400
      Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-09 10:11 -0500
        Re: higher precision doubles Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2011-08-09 22:40 -0400
          Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-09 22:06 -0500
            Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-10 08:53 -0700
  Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 21:24 +0200
    Re: higher precision doubles markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-06 13:29 -0700
      Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-06 23:20 +0200
        Re: higher precision doubles markspace <-@.> - 2011-08-06 15:43 -0700
          Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:06 +0200
            Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 16:21 -0700
              Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:34 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 21:32 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 17:24 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 17:39 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-07 09:26 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 21:23 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-07 20:48 -0400
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 09:05 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-08 05:37 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 19:08 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 19:16 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-08 19:29 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-08 21:34 -0500
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-08 13:49 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-09 01:08 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-09 02:44 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-09 12:52 +0200
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-09 13:15 -0700
                Re: higher precision doubles BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-08-07 13:51 -0700
              Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 01:59 +0200
        Re: higher precision doubles Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-08-08 21:03 -0500
    Re: higher precision doubles Eric Sosman <esosman@ieee-dot-org.invalid> - 2011-08-06 17:33 -0400
    Re: higher precision doubles Patricia Shanahan <pats@acm.org> - 2011-08-06 14:51 -0700
      Re: higher precision doubles Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2011-08-07 00:57 +0200

csiph-web