Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4908

Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ...

Show all headers | View raw

On 6/2/2011 3:19 PM, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
> On 11-06-02 06:21 PM, BGB wrote:
>> On 6/2/2011 1:22 PM, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
>>> On 11-06-02 08:34 AM, Paul Cager wrote:
>>>> On Jun 2, 11:42 am, Lawrence D'Oliveiro<l...@geek-
>>>> central.gen.new_zealand>   wrote:
>>>>> In message
>>>>> <9b584a36-f160-4e01-8e2f-ca3f83f17...@x10g2000yqj.googlegroups.com>,
>>>>> Paul
>>>>>
>>>>> Cager wrote:
>>>>>> It looks to be the standard 3-clause BSD license to me - that's a good
>>>>>> thing, isn't it?
>>>>>
>>>>> It would if the code were worth copyrighting.
>>>>
>>>> You seem to misunderstand the difference between copyright and a
>>>> license.
>>>
>>> Who's talking about a license? Oracle is attempting to copyright that
>>> HelloWorld code. Strictly speaking they didn't even have to include that
>>> "Copyright (c) 1995, 2008, Oracle..." bit, but since they did their
>>> intentions are very clear. They also refer to themselves as the
>>> copyright holder a little bit further down the blurb.
>>>
>>> Everything about that boilerplate has to do with copyright.
>>>
>>
>> but, it is worth noting a few things:
>> the text appears to be a fairly standard 3-clause BSD-style license;
>> it is generally considered to be proper withing FOSS circles to put such
>> a notice in *every* source file, such that it remains clear at all
>> points how the code in question is licensed.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BSD_license
>>
>> note the section on the "New BSD License", which as may be noted, has
>> very similar text and style (about the only differences I see is that
>> Oracle inserted its name in the appropriate spots, labeled "<copyright
>> holder>" in the aforementioned license).
>>
>> generally, an absence of such a notice is (implicitly) meant to imply
>> that it owned by the original owner, with all rights reserved except
>> under the permission of the original author, until 80 years following
>> said author's death (under which point it goes into public domain).
>>
>> putting such a notice in a file thus states that a person is free to use
>> said "hello world" program under the stated terms (which include copying
>> and the creation of derivative works, ...). or effectively that the
>> original author is waiving some of their legal rights.
>>
>> yes, one can argue that it is a little silly to bother with this for a
>> "hello world" program, but there is no obvious malice or ill-intention
>> on Oracle's part for having done so.
>>
> Again, not discussing licensing yet, copyright applies to *original*
> works. Regardless of the exact mechanics of a copyright coming into
> force in various jurisdictions, Oracle can NOT copyright HelloWorld in
> any language, not to mention a bunch of other obvious and much-used code.
>
> I don't think they are malicious either. I simply think they have
> ignorant lawyers and cowed developers.
>

actually, it depends on how one defines "original".

AFAIK the usual working definition of original is that it was originally 
written by a certain person.

given a person can easily write out a hello world program without 
needing to go any copy code from any other source, it classifies as 
original (as opposed to a derived work, which would incorporate code 
from another source, say if one copy/pasted the "Hello World" string 
from another such example).


hence, I can go type out, say (in my own original / creatively-designed 
HLL):
import bs.io;
void main(string[] args)
{
	printf("Hello World\n");
}

and, since I was the one to write it (say, as an example for this usenet 
post), legally I can claim copyright on it.

granted, this does not mean that it is "original" in the sense that it 
involves any non-trivial behavior or creative thought (but, AFAIK, this 
is not the sense of "original" that copyright deals with).


or such...

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-02 15:12 +1200
  Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-02 02:11 -0700
    Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-02 22:42 +1200
      Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-02 04:34 -0700
        Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 00:08 +1200
          Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-02 06:20 -0700
            Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 15:10 +1200
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-02 21:47 -0700
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 17:05 +1200
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-03 02:50 -0400
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 19:49 +1200
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-03 11:16 -0400
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-04 12:28 +1200
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-04 02:54 -0400
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-05 11:05 +1200
        Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-02 17:22 -0300
          Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-02 14:21 -0700
            Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-02 19:19 -0300
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-02 15:42 -0700
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-02 20:14 -0300
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 17:07 +1200
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-03 01:01 -0700
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-02 15:56 -0700
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Joshua Cranmer <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2011-06-02 22:21 -0400
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-02 21:36 -0700
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 19:48 +1200
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... rossum <rossum48@coldmail.com> - 2011-06-03 00:33 +0100
            Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 17:06 +1200
          Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-02 17:50 -0700
            Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-03 15:10 +1200
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-06-03 18:15 +0200
            Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Arved Sandstrom <asandstrom3minus1@eastlink.ca> - 2011-06-03 06:56 -0300
              Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Paul Cager <paul.cager@googlemail.com> - 2011-06-03 04:21 -0700
                Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-06-04 12:26 +1200
    Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered “Hello World” Program ... BGB <cr88192@hotmail.com> - 2011-06-02 03:53 -0700
  Re: And The Award For Most Legally-Encumbered ?Hello World? Program ... Steve Sobol <sjsobol@JustThe.net> - 2011-06-02 11:00 -0700

csiph-web