Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4514

Re: Java generics and type erasure

Show key headers only | View raw

John B. Matthews wrote:
> Marcin Pietraszek<m.pietraszek@gmail.com>  wrote:
>
>> Some time ago I've encountered stange behaviour while using generics,
>> small example is provided in gist:
>>
>> https://gist.github.com/977599

You should post the code in the message instead of out of band.

import java.util.*;

public class Foo<T> {

     private Map<String, Integer> bar = new HashMap<String, Integer>();

     public static void main(String ... args) {
         Foo<Boolean> foo1 = new Foo<Boolean>();
         Integer x1 = foo1.bar.get("x"); // ok

         Foo foo2 = new Foo<Boolean>();
         Integer x2 = foo2.bar.get("x"); // compilation failure
     }

}

>> Anybody could explain me why in second example (line commended with
>> "compilation failure") compilation fails?

> You neglected to specify the type parameter for foo2, specified in the
> declaration Foo<T>. Without the actual type,<Boolean>, the compiler
> can only infer that get() returns Object, as would have been the case
> prior to generics:
>
> import java.util.*;
>
> public class Foo<T>  {
>
>      private Map<String, Integer>  bar = new HashMap<String, Integer>();
>
>      public static void main(String... args) {
>          Foo<Boolean>  foo1 = new Foo<Boolean>();
>          Integer x1 = foo1.bar.get("x"); // ok
>
>          Foo<Boolean>  foo2 = new Foo<Boolean>();
>          Integer x2 = foo2.bar.get("x"); // compilation failure
>      }
>
>> Do you know any detailed description on how and when type erasure
>> works in java?

> "All of these parameterized types share the same class at runtime."
>
> <http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/classes.html#8.1.2>
>
> See also, Bloch, ch. 5:
>
> <http://java.sun.com/docs/books/effective/>

It's subtler than that.  The generic parameter is on 'Foo', not the map.  The 
map type does not depend on the type parameter.  So the question is why the 
'get()' returns 'Object'.  Naively, one would expect the type of 'bar' to 
resolve to 'Map<String, Integer>' no matter what '<T>' is, or isn't.

The only thing I can think of is that leaving the type parameter out in the 
containing class means that all bets are off, and the compiler gives up on 
generics throughout that variable's depth.  Thus it doesn't even bother to 
parse the 'bar' parameters, defaulting thus to '<?,?>'.  Consequently, the 
type of the expression 'foo2.bar.get("x")' is 'Object'.  The assignment target 
of that expression is 'Integer', and that requires an explicit downcast, 
omitted in the code along with the type parameter.

This is an object lesson (pun intended) in how bad it really can be to omit 
the type parameter.

I haven't looked up chapter and verse on this reasoning yet.  Anyone care to 
rise to the challenge?

A couple of observations:

Type erasure has absolutely nothing to do with this.  Type erasure happens at 
run time.  It will never create a compiler error.

The direct dot reference to a 'private' member is a bit dodgy, though allowed 
in the class's own 'main()'.

-- 
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-23 13:18 -0700
  Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-23 22:54 -0400
    Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 01:45 -0400
      Re: Java generics and type erasure Marcin Pietraszek <m.pietraszek@gmail.com> - 2011-05-24 12:39 -0700
      Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 20:04 +0000
        Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-24 17:06 -0400
          Re: Java generics and type erasure Ian Shef <invalid@avoiding.spam> - 2011-05-24 23:05 +0000
            Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-25 00:13 +0000
              Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 10:18 +1200
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 01:12 +0000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 13:59 +1200
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Susan Calvin <s.calvin@usr.invalid> - 2011-05-26 04:18 +0000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-26 18:48 +1200
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-26 18:34 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 07:45 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure "John B. Matthews" <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2011-05-26 15:25 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 12:01 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-26 22:15 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 13:04 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:27 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:07 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:18 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Andreas Leitgeb <avl@gamma.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2011-05-27 17:03 +0000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 13:27 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:19 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Tom McGlynn <taqmcg@gmail.com> - 2011-05-26 19:53 -0700
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 01:30 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-27 18:09 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-27 10:22 -0400
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Esmond Pitt <esmond.pitt@bigpond.com> - 2011-05-30 15:23 +1000
                Re: Java generics and type erasure Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-30 02:35 -0400

csiph-web