Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #4407
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.albasani.net!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: New in Java 7: JLayer |
| Date | Sun, 22 May 2011 07:44:32 -0400 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Lines | 20 |
| Message-ID | <irasur$2sr$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ir3m9d$497$1@dont-email.me> <BfednXyP-ZZ4SEjQnZ2dnUVZ_j-dnZ2d@giganews.com> <ir4om1$qeh$1@speranza.aioe.org> <1PKdnV9XXeKKiErQnZ2dnUVZ_jidnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <iracjj$knn$1@speranza.aioe.org> <irae6l$2mb$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| X-Trace | news.albasani.net D2nT6xOHhbq4EvKi+EpRr5UXQ0mq6yXLZ0+bZXWg+QqWmi47BFCoV+Z6qMQy7prG7UB4kIYAwiCMoCpRC+LjSDOgxAZeP2OMBUdz0sTBjcLFNjWOV2Zl7ZreX6Z0/+ck |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Sun, 22 May 2011 11:44:27 +0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | news.albasani.net; logging-data="8M/mM8AhdJz8zVPwCoGllAkbCNl+jB/ojrg6XCTDxm+hHed9QPvbGsUOqXkWZe3Ki6Rmksgg2TdV2gKQOhSkPGJC+1QuVfikdL7+7V81yZbC8F7eVjBTIXp1DiSuKleZ"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@albasani.net" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110424 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
| In-Reply-To | <irae6l$2mb$5@lust.ihug.co.nz> |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:rQci8jTJB397EC/BKaeZvoKPXDI= |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.java.programmer:4407 |
Show key headers only | View raw
awrence D'Oliveiro wrote: > Richard Maher wrote: >> Agreed but my 2c says the attitude that has held Applets back the most is >> the either/or mentality. > I wonder where that came from ... Sun’s litigiousness towards Microsoft, > perhaps? No, Lawrence. You assume Richard's point is correct and draw a generality from one action, Lawrence. Sun sued Microsoft once, AFAIK, and it was over an egregious violation of the Java license terms. In any event, Lawrence, there's no evidence that that lawsuit had any effect on the attitudes of Java programmers, nor that the attitude is as Richard described it, Lawrence. -- Lew Honi soit qui mal y pense. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
New in Java 7: JLayer markspace <-@.> - 2011-05-19 11:07 -0700
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-19 15:37 -0400
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li> - 2011-05-20 00:56 +0100
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Daniele Futtorovic <da.futt.news@laposte-dot-net.invalid> - 2011-05-19 22:29 +0200
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-05-19 21:45 -0500
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer "Nasser M. Abbasi" <nma@12000.org> - 2011-05-19 20:54 -0700
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer jebblue <n@n.nnn> - 2011-05-20 18:17 -0500
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer "Qu0ll" <Qu0llSixFour@gmail.com> - 2011-05-21 11:26 +1000
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer "Richard Maher" <maher_rj@hotspamnotmail.com> - 2011-05-22 15:05 +0800
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-22 19:32 +1200
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-22 07:44 -0400
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@geek-central.gen.new_zealand> - 2011-05-22 19:31 +1200
Re: New in Java 7: JLayer Lew <noone@lewscanon.com> - 2011-05-22 07:48 -0400
csiph-web